From: Inemesit Affia <inemesitaffia@gmail.com>
To: the keyboard of geoff goodfellow <geoff@iconia.com>
Cc: Starlink <Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] SpaceX no longer taking losses to produce Starlink satellite antennas, a key step to improving profitability
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2023 18:52:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJEhh70hSJZkvWQBRXKc4evahSyj4p8rKjWnG6NTs0P45CDgYQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf-zrgATD69bS2waYY3UbsYPeG3SnAoPaSKm8k2M13F1mp9QA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1197 bytes --]
That's quite strange. They sell equipment at different prices everywhere.
So what's this price? I assume $500 to $750 but could it be even cheaper?
Amazon said thier target is $400
On Wed, Sep 13, 2023, 6:05 PM the keyboard of geoff goodfellow via Starlink
<starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> - SpaceX is no longer absorbing the cost of the Starlink antennas that
> it sells with its satellite internet service, a company executive said on
> Wednesday.
> - “We were subsidizing terminals but we’ve been iterating on our
> terminal production so much that we’re no longer subsidizing terminals,
> which is a good place to be,” Jonathan Hofeller, SpaceX vice president of
> Starlink and commercial sales, said during a panel at the World Satellite
> Business Week conference.
>
> [...]
>
> https://www.cnbc.com/2023/09/13/spacex-no-longer-taking-losses-to-produce-starlink-satellite-antennas.html
>
> --
> Geoff.Goodfellow@iconia.com
> living as The Truth is True
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2653 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-13 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-13 17:04 the keyboard of geoff goodfellow
2023-09-13 17:52 ` Inemesit Affia [this message]
2023-09-13 21:36 ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-09-13 21:59 ` Larry Press
2023-09-13 21:28 ` Larry Press
2023-09-13 21:32 ` Marc Blanchet
2023-09-13 21:39 ` Larry Press
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJEhh70hSJZkvWQBRXKc4evahSyj4p8rKjWnG6NTs0P45CDgYQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=inemesitaffia@gmail.com \
--cc=Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=geoff@iconia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox