[Starlink] Re: Starlink and Iran

[Inemesit Affia <inemesitaffia@gmail.com>]

By different orbits you mean like Molniya? The Russians use that

On Sat, Jan 17, 2026, 7:32 PM Michael Richardson via Starlink <
starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:

> --------
>
> Ulrich Speidel <u.speidel@auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
>     >> 1. Who checks/enforces this ITU limit?
>
>     > The licensing authorities in the respective countries (i.e., the FCC
> in the
>     > US - and they're held to account by their competitors, of which
> SpaceX has a
>     > few in the US). At an international level, if one country were to
>     > ignore
>
> Yes, but dieselgate.  Obey, except when it is important not to.
>
>     >> 2. Could the physically satellites go higher over some territory?
> How much higher?
>     >> I assume it's software controlled.
>
>     > A satellite has three types of energy that determine its orbital
> motion:
>     > Potential energy from orbital height, kinetic energy from moving, and
>     > energy
>
> Sorry, you mis-understood, or I mis-typed, I now understand.
> I meant, go to a higher-power.  Not a higher orbit :-)
>
> ----
>
> (Has anyone proposed eliptical orbits for LEOs or MEOs, such that they
> would
> be lower whenever they are over the service territory, and higher
> otherwise.
> I imagine it would be horribly complex to work out, given various
> precessions, and it's not clear to me why.  I think because less drag when
> not low down...)
>
>
>
>
> --
> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh
> networks [
> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT
> architect   [
> ]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on
> rails    [
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list -- starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> To unsubscribe send an email to starlink-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net
>