From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pj1-x102c.google.com (mail-pj1-x102c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05AA03B29D for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2023 01:56:50 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102c.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-27ff83feb29so195766a91.3 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 22:56:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1700031409; x=1700636209; darn=lists.bufferbloat.net; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5nY5IIGhGea7n4Bv3aLGrxyrPpXoY8WcOj9G4GP/Xa0=; b=M7bYa/Dqpfl5WFzRZNmIEPhZwYNSfsfXTsZ2xQzHBPGm5XbQ6xV2XQVCCR7skZJOrT keBi/Km7zu5lcXenrinuvZnMGp7IGlKAd92+2sG3GieZ9U5Le/RhY3GxIpV8z+8NaMzp tUt2g77ci7TC12D/QXHiPoO4RwDi9pUNm8guqbCSd1LpIKF//j/sNUknmKzKpT9EXvQC 1mfiPMbnfj71mDDIeLjLbwOkIeDbVi+Rs30IXPR68rRoe95xes7EgZQYzCWn2dtn+Tos 78gWJWfukm0Q9GMIPOkK06Z2t7fDx989eB/FftOa/2nnml84Fg37WOWDvPuLkAT9v7qk uBzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1700031409; x=1700636209; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=5nY5IIGhGea7n4Bv3aLGrxyrPpXoY8WcOj9G4GP/Xa0=; b=OM9a10kY9N8m7d8olQx82InZaKvfAGhY/tbrx4rJkKSZIJVR1lnOPy+iF2jGxdUsI2 sABk4WjF5LScILu8G/L8kurEZf4cbSAXr2GYD4XkWQjWQSWGoLAj+s5bjWBCzQCBxbb+ 9HwKTTEYpyX91v0m1VHQtWj0/l7EAP8zl2NFPogn2Gx8/EA0eS2Kk4i4K3W8LAx6pk+S 4woEjZHKTf70x7FeAxHsEQ93dYMCz6/8/iSSbnEVdh0aCRuC1e/Ho9KVURmmSI0Yrrhe PJ6igZ3JlNYFUKu/IYZrLJ9/uGomcHo1kyv57uJbZABxpYpaNfo3cVwQ3jbMrx/fassw nWeA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzz4pEtQStasEHXqC6zjRguY/KbBjbqrdYfY7QSrUizTIvk8sgW ENgELGv2RXFmX4mUxDH04yZXhYEOEIhWz/Xsr0s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE/CL74zXhJUNVmM0aZcDVUeDXv5ZbQnpPsuzR+TkHDfdSkjbyz/457iY6cMGcoACIo75ii2/DOdAL9b3ymWKc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4a47:b0:27c:e062:c464 with SMTP id lb7-20020a17090b4a4700b0027ce062c464mr13237438pjb.37.1700031409475; Tue, 14 Nov 2023 22:56:49 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <34D160E7-6C8F-4882-B1C3-570DF3D3854F@connectivitycap.com> In-Reply-To: From: Inemesit Affia Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 07:56:35 +0100 Message-ID: To: Jim Forster Cc: Starlink Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000044d643060a2b68bd" Subject: Re: [Starlink] Question on Startlink density X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 06:56:51 -0000 --00000000000044d643060a2b68bd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Get a high performance dish too On Wed, Nov 15, 2023, 7:55 AM Inemesit Affia wrote: > What you're planning might we'll be against the Starlink TOS. > > Just contact https://old.reddit.com/user/millijuna. He's done something > similar > > Beyond that networks are networks. You estimate your peak traffic, find > out the worst case speed on starlink and get software/hardware to shape & > prioritize traffic/users so phone calls work when the WAN can't do video. > Check out libreqos > > Also the owner of starlink.sx is on this mailing list and has experience > with this sort of thing > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023, 7:13 AM Jim Forster via Starlink < > starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote: > >> >> Does Starlink=E2=80=99s beam forming support delivering services to abou= t 100 >> home stretched over one mile? The place in question would like to do >> fiber, but it=E2=80=99s in a senstive area, so getting permits is tricky= (cannot >> use any previously undisturbed land), and so the fiber project has dragg= ed >> on. Now SL is available and some are getting it. That=E2=80=99s fine, = but could >> it support 100 over one linear mile? >> >> Thanks, >> >> =E2=80=94 Jim >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlink mailing list >> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink >> > --00000000000044d643060a2b68bd Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Get a high performance dish too

On Wed, Nov 15, 2023, 7:55= AM Inemesit Affia <inemesita= ffia@gmail.com> wrote:
What you're planning might we'll be against the Starli= nk TOS.

Just contact=C2=A0https://old.reddit.com/user/millijuna. He's done something = similar

Beyond that networ= ks are networks. You estimate your peak traffic, find out the worst case sp= eed on starlink and get software/hardware to shape & prioritize traffic= /users so phone calls work when the WAN can't do video. Check out libre= qos

Also the owner of starlink.= sx is on this mailing list and has experience with this sort=C2=A0of th= ing

On Wed, Nov 15, 2023, 7:13 AM Jim Forster via Starlink <= starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:

Does Starlink=E2=80=99s beam forming support delivering services to about 1= 00 home stretched over one mile?=C2=A0 The place in question would like to = do fiber, but it=E2=80=99s in a senstive area, so getting permits is tricky= (cannot use any previously undisturbed land), and so the fiber project has= dragged on.=C2=A0 Now SL is available and some are getting it.=C2=A0 That= =E2=80=99s fine, but could it support 100 over one linear mile?

Thanks,

=C2=A0 =E2=80=94 Jim
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/l= istinfo/starlink
--00000000000044d643060a2b68bd--