Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>
To: Inemesit Affia <inemesitaffia@gmail.com>
Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Starlink] Re: Wi-Fi Alliance’s QoS Management Specification Release 2 (R2) what's this new standard about?
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2025 12:02:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJUtOOgkHE8P_PZCmO+YX0hjWN_6K5jBkTn2QrqHfWpN=XcfLQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2ddc0355-9c1a-4cee-8970-e5c01a29141e@gmail.com>

Sadly, no real deal; FQ-CoDel with BQL and CAKE, from what I see.

All the best,

Frank
Frantisek (Frank) Borsik

In loving memory of Dave Täht: 1965-2025
https://libreqos.io/2025/04/01/in-loving-memory-of-dave/


https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714
iMessage, mobile: +420775230885
Skype: casioa5302ca
frantisek.borsik@gmail.com


On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 at 3:12 PM, Inemesit Affia via Starlink <
starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:

> From
>
> https://www.rcrwireless.com/20251205/network-infrastructure/wi-fi-qos
>
> Dec 11, 2025 2:40:31 AM Inemesit Affia <inemesitaffia@gmail.com>:
>
> > An image from AWS Invent.
> >
> > They expect sub 46-50 ms at launch.
> >
> > None of us live in a POP/NAP but I've seen Speedtest pings on Starlink
> sub 17ms so..
> >
> > I wonder what OneWeb is capable of. I'm seeing 45ms as best case for
> them in the field.
> >
> > Dec 9, 2025 12:33:51 AM David Lang <david@lang.hm>:
> >
> >> Michael Kan wrote:
> >>
> >>> latency for Amazon Leo? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZCx612z930
> >>
> >> Until they have the system operational, be very leery about bandwidth
> and latency claims.
> >>
> >> Remember that Starlink had to do-bloat things to make their
> user-experienced latency line up with their early lab tests.
> >>
> >> David Lang
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list -- starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> To unsubscribe send an email to starlink-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net
>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-13 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-06 15:36 [Starlink] Amazon Leo announcing up to 1 Gbps (DOWN) and 400 Mbps (UP) Frantisek Borsik
2025-12-06 16:36 ` [Starlink] " J Pan
2025-12-06 23:58 ` David Lang
2025-12-07  0:02   ` Inemesit Affia
2025-12-07  0:08     ` David Lang
2025-12-08  4:31       ` Inemesit Affia
     [not found]         ` <5098.1765221714@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
2025-12-08 20:57           ` David Lang
     [not found]             ` <2609.1765228007@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
2025-12-08 21:15               ` David Lang
2025-12-08 21:22                 ` Michael Kan
2025-12-08 23:19                   ` Inemesit Affia
2025-12-08 23:20                     ` Inemesit Affia
2025-12-08 23:33                   ` David Lang
2025-12-11  1:40                     ` Inemesit Affia
2025-12-12 14:12                       ` [Starlink] Wi-Fi Alliance’s QoS Management Specification Release 2 (R2) what's this new standard about? Inemesit Affia
2025-12-13 11:02                         ` Frantisek Borsik [this message]
2025-12-13 11:26                           ` [Starlink] " Sebastian Moeller
2025-12-09  1:26             ` [Starlink] Re: Amazon Leo announcing up to 1 Gbps (DOWN) and 400 Mbps (UP) David Collier-Brown
2025-12-09  7:49               ` Frantisek Borsik
2025-12-09  8:11                 ` Inemesit Affia
2025-12-09  8:23                   ` Frantisek Borsik
2025-12-09  8:21                     ` Inemesit Affia
2025-12-09  8:29                       ` Inemesit Affia
2025-12-09 21:53                         ` Frantisek Borsik
2025-12-10  1:06                           ` Nick Matthews
2025-12-10  1:24                             ` Frantisek Borsik
2025-12-10  1:45                               ` Joe Hamelin
2025-12-09 13:23       ` Livingood, Jason
2025-12-09 21:33         ` David Lang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJUtOOgkHE8P_PZCmO+YX0hjWN_6K5jBkTn2QrqHfWpN=XcfLQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=frantisek.borsik@gmail.com \
    --cc=inemesitaffia@gmail.com \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox