From: Frantisek Borsik <frantisek.borsik@gmail.com>
To: "Dave Taht via Starlink" <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects
heard this time!" <nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
dickroy@alum.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [Starlink] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink's RDOF Application
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 23:38:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJUtOOi_-OsgRPSLvCV0UpDCQjv+R61uf02fxYW1PbkEQy4hqA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A8DC9114A92F47D5AAE1D332B5E5007D@SRA6>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2511 bytes --]
I would love for Nathan to be here with us, and comment on that :-) so I
will add NN list as well.
All the best,
Frank
Frantisek (Frank) Borsik
https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714
iMessage, mobile: +420775230885
Skype: casioa5302ca
frantisek.borsik@gmail.com
On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 at 11:21 PM, Richard Roy <dickroy3777@comcast.net>
wrote:
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Starlink [mailto:starlink-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net] *On
> Behalf Of *Frantisek Borsik via Starlink
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 13, 2023 1:26 PM
> *To:* Dave Taht via Starlink
> *Subject:* [Starlink] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink’s RDOF Application
>
>
>
> “*Elon Musk*’s Starlink was not the only major company to inflate its
> capabilities
> <https://broadbandbreakfast.com/2021/04/rdof-reverse-auction-criticized-google-makes-pandemic-gains-california-broadband-access-for-k-12/> in
> RDOF bids. Nearly 100 bidders have defaulted since the auction, leaving in
> limbo an estimated $2.8 billion
> <https://broadbandbreakfast.com/2023/06/what-happens-to-the-estimated-2-8-billion-in-rdof-defaults/> of
> the $9.2 billion originally awarded.
>
>
>
> The FCC upheld another denial
> <https://broadbandbreakfast.com/2023/12/fcc-proposes-22-million-fine-against-ltd-over-rdof/>
> on Monday in the case of LTD Broadband, which appealed the commission’s
> finding that it could not reasonably serve the more than 500,000 locations
> to which it had committed. The commission also hit LTD with a $21.7 million
> fine for its default.
>
> The commission’s two Republicans dissented to Starlink’s denial, claiming
> they saw a path for the company to improve its speeds before the first
> deployment deadline in 2025.”
>
> *[RR] The reason two lawyers “saw a path” is because they were
> bribed/conned into to see it. In my nearly 50years of experience dealing
> with the FCC, extremely rarely are the people at the top in the commission
> tech savvy. In general, they have NO CLUE when it comes to technology …
> period! **JJ*
>
>
>
>
> https://broadbandbreakfast.com/2023/12/fcc-upholds-denial-of-starlinks-rdof-application/
>
>
>
>
> All the best,
>
> Frank
> Frantisek (Frank) Borsik
>
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
> Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714
> iMessage, mobile: +420775230885
> Skype: casioa5302ca
> frantisek.borsik@gmail.com
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 10712 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-13 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-13 21:25 [Starlink] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink’s " Frantisek Borsik
[not found] ` <A8DC9114A92F47D5AAE1D332B5E5007D@SRA6>
2023-12-13 22:38 ` Frantisek Borsik [this message]
2023-12-14 2:46 ` [Starlink] [NNagain] FCC Upholds Denial of Starlink's " Robert McMahon
2023-12-14 6:11 ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-12-14 17:48 ` David Bray, PhD
2023-12-14 18:47 ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-12-14 18:51 ` Nathan Simington
2023-12-14 19:44 ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-12-15 12:07 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-12-15 12:37 ` Gert Doering
2023-12-15 12:43 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-12-15 12:44 ` Gert Doering
2023-12-15 12:46 ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-12-15 13:24 ` Gert Doering
2023-12-15 13:40 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-12-15 18:06 ` David Lang
2023-12-15 18:51 ` rjmcmahon
2023-12-15 19:13 ` David Lang
2023-12-15 21:29 ` rjmcmahon
2023-12-15 21:42 ` David Lang
2023-12-15 22:04 ` David Bray, PhD
2023-12-15 22:10 ` David Lang
2023-12-15 22:13 ` David Bray, PhD
2023-12-15 22:33 ` Kenline, Doug
2023-12-15 22:36 ` Dave Taht
2023-12-19 19:33 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-12-15 22:05 ` rjmcmahon
2023-12-15 22:13 ` David Lang
2023-12-15 22:26 ` Dave Taht
2023-12-16 4:16 ` David Lang
2023-12-16 17:30 ` rjmcmahon
2023-12-16 18:48 ` Robert McMahon
2023-12-16 21:44 ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-12-16 22:28 ` Robert McMahon
2023-12-17 0:25 ` Dave Taht
2023-12-23 21:17 ` J Pan
2023-12-18 8:25 ` David Lang
2023-12-15 15:46 ` Livingood, Jason
2023-12-17 17:32 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-12-17 18:06 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-12-16 8:15 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-12-15 13:06 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-12-16 8:09 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-12-16 11:14 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-12-17 1:54 ` [Starlink] other fcc services at sea Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJUtOOi_-OsgRPSLvCV0UpDCQjv+R61uf02fxYW1PbkEQy4hqA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=frantisek.borsik@gmail.com \
--cc=dickroy@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox