From: Sauli Kiviranta <smksauli@gmail.com>
To: J Pan <Pan@uvic.ca>
Cc: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Starlink] Re: Testing 4K live video over Starlink with added +10% packet loss
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:05:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJbqEYC+GqvGPye365nmRoo9=9UEA_dCRU-9rbqqUco07F-TRw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHn=e4hxFcB4=84BnwzPuntMDbpPptaSdLnCFNUG67QZg+sV6A@mail.gmail.com>
This is all just TCP, that was kind of thew idea. Not yet with FEC though,
working on that, just rusty good old TCP.
Best regards,
Sauli
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 12:02 AM J Pan <Pan@uvic.ca> wrote:
> fast.com measures tcp performance and you used udp to get the best out
> of a lossy link? spacex uses multiple starlink dishes on a launch
> vehicle and pick whatever made through too
> --
> J Pan, UVic CSc, ECS566, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), Pan@UVic.CA,
> Web.UVic.CA/~pan
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 1:50 PM Sauli Kiviranta via Starlink
> <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >
> > We start to get somewhere that is what I would say cool level. Our target
> > is Ulrich Spiedel storm conditions measured over the Gabriella cyclone
> with
> > Starlink.
> >
> > https://x.com/sksauli/status/1964349734304301268
> >
> > We have also now test running just accelerating all data, so we can get
> > same effects for better utilization rate of the link.
> >
> > Anyone know what kind of bit error rates or packet loss levels are in the
> > streams for SpaceX launches? Usually they look very very stable.
> >
> > Anyone want to test this? Send me email sauli.kiviranta@xrtc.io
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Sauli
> > _______________________________________________
> > Starlink mailing list -- starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> > To unsubscribe send an email to starlink-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-09 20:49 [Starlink] " Sauli Kiviranta
2025-09-09 21:02 ` [Starlink] " J Pan
2025-09-09 21:05 ` Sauli Kiviranta [this message]
2025-09-09 21:13 ` J Pan
2025-09-09 21:26 ` Sauli Kiviranta
2025-09-10 8:11 ` Sauli Kiviranta
2025-09-10 15:53 ` J Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJbqEYC+GqvGPye365nmRoo9=9UEA_dCRU-9rbqqUco07F-TRw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=smksauli@gmail.com \
--cc=Pan@uvic.ca \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox