From: "Luis A. Cornejo" <luis.a.cornejo@gmail.com>
To: Colin_Higbie <CHigbie1@higbie.name>
Cc: "starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net" <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Starlink] Re: Starlink Standby Mode
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 15:14:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKJdXWBvBSyG7P8BF6+7s9SUYtFvbg=dwK=nVe15=iQgFFuJAg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN7PPF7A8514BADE730032D2BBC932445E2F10FA@BN7PPF7A8514BAD.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
There is another electric cooperative in my county that did just that.
Strung fiber along the posts, I was not lucky enough to be part of their
territory. But from people that I know it’s similar that’s it’s fast but
not always reliable, so storms can take some down, often around here it’s
also a backhoe, and when it does down, it’s down for a while.
But I agree, it’s a great backup. Although it probably costs almost as much
to run in electricity as the service itself! =o)
-Luis
On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 1:41 PM Colin_Higbie via Starlink <
starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> I find the Standby mode to be a great backup option. $5/mo for unlimited
> low-bandwidth usage. This is something I've been urging them to offer for
> about a year now.
>
> About 18 months after I originally purchased and subscribed to Starlink,
> our power company (not phone company as you'd expect, really our electric
> power company) rolled out fiber to rural communities in northern NH. As
> great as Starlink was compared to what we had before, fiber is even better
> now that it's available (1Gbps for $79/mo, consistently tests as A on
> Bufferbloat). But it's not 100% reliable. For example, when there are
> widespread power outages, it goes down. The Starlink standby option is
> perfect for those situations.
>
> Latency remains decent, just limited bandwidth. And if the fiber outage
> remains in effect for too long, we could always activate Starlink at full
> bandwidth for that month, where it appears they're taking that option away
> from people with inactive accounts not already on Standby mode (they may be
> bluffing on that – you'd think they would want to make it easy for anyone
> to give them money and resubscribe, standby customer or not).
>
> Cheers,
> Colin
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list -- starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> To unsubscribe send an email to starlink-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <175739769285.1561.9299932820839760282@gauss>
2025-09-09 18:41 ` Colin_Higbie
2025-09-09 20:14 ` Luis A. Cornejo [this message]
2025-09-09 21:01 ` Oleg Kutkov
2025-09-09 21:20 ` J Pan
2025-09-10 5:36 ` Ulrich Speidel
2025-09-10 6:00 ` Sebastian Moeller
2025-09-10 7:53 ` David Lang
2025-09-10 10:24 ` Ulrich Speidel
2025-09-10 16:01 ` J Pan
2025-09-08 21:34 [Starlink] " Luis A. Cornejo
2025-09-09 5:35 ` [Starlink] " J Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKJdXWBvBSyG7P8BF6+7s9SUYtFvbg=dwK=nVe15=iQgFFuJAg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=luis.a.cornejo@gmail.com \
--cc=CHigbie1@higbie.name \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox