Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Owens <nathan@nathan.io>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] teardown of the starlink provided "router"
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 08:23:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALjsLJtPDJcwkWZ55jFxvqrCVpjTp7_eLT7yiPwjQW3XdK2-CQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5YFaDDqrUFwUa7oLVZb0CxJOjmT-d3ZEuerfc7pxhQbg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1627 bytes --]

Here ya go: https://fcc.report/FCC-ID/2AWHPR201/4805890
There's at least one teardown video, but the FCC pics are better.

Qualcomm IPQ4018, can run OpenWrt 19.07.7, or the latest 21.02.1 RC branch.

--Nathan

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 8:20 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would really like someone to disassemble, and take photographs of
> the chipset and design of the starlink provided "router",
> which is proving to be such a disaster, and put those up somewhere.
> Youtube videos seem to be popular... we could do a
>  kvetchy one of those?
>
> I have really goofed in that my visit to the starlink site I'd assumed
> the dishy was all there was! At one level I'm deliriously happy
> that that router can be junked, and with a decent OS, ipv6 etc can be
> enabled, as well as many other interesting local
> networking services. At another level I'm grumpy as to have to throw
> out all the bufferbloat related testing to date.
>
> In my dream world, the dishy would do ethernet flow control at a
> "single transmit upstream buffer" granularity, below 4ms, and
> emit pause frames that an fq_codel upstream could deal with, but that
> still is not enough, accurate parsing of the dishy's actual link rates
> up and down would allow for controlling the sch_cake queues tighter.
>
> --
> Latest Podcast:
> https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6791014284936785920/
>
> Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2422 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-18 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-18 15:20 Dave Taht
2021-05-18 15:23 ` Nathan Owens [this message]
2021-05-18 15:28   ` Nathan Owens
2021-05-18 16:32     ` Dave Taht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALjsLJtPDJcwkWZ55jFxvqrCVpjTp7_eLT7yiPwjQW3XdK2-CQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=nathan@nathan.io \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox