I found out you can build custom kernels for the UDM Pro. The current one doesn't have CAKE, but it does have FQ_CODEL so I switched to that for now. I'll get around to building a custom kernel in the coming weeks. I'm running pihole and ntopng now: https://github.com/boostchicken/udm-utilities On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 4:04 PM Dave Taht wrote: > hmm, the ubnt udm pro is also built around buildroot. > > Is there some 3rd party software shop out there doing wierd things with > json, etc, leveraging buildroot? I mean… angular? come on... > > The udm pro is really great hw, saddled with really crappy software. As > appears to be the dishy…. I hope one day we could make openwrt run on both. > > > > > On May 16, 2021, at 3:21 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > > > On 5/16/21 10:30 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > >> > https://www.starlink.com/assets/pdfs/Starlink-Open-Source-Components-License-Notices.pdf > >> I don’t see any obvious notes to openwrt related modules, nor dnsmasq. > linux 4.9 seems to be in use. > > > > Thank you for this link. > > It says: "buildroot2017.1" many software components are from the end of > 2016 or the beginning of 2017 which matches the buildroot version. This > does not look like an OpenWrt (fork) or something using the QSDK. > > > > They are using musl libc from 2020 and Linux 4.9. > > > > Did anyone request access to the code for the Open Source Components > used by Starlink? > > They says: > > > You may request access to the code for our Open Source Components > > > through your Starlink account. > > https://www.starlink.com/legal/software-license-and-usage-terms > > > > If so, it would be nice if you could upload the code somewhere. > > > > Hauke > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink >