From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-il1-x136.google.com (mail-il1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02BA33B2A4 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 17:52:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-il1-x136.google.com with SMTP id h3so2606024ilc.9 for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:52:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nathan.io; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Js0Z6FE46i2fBH0Hde3UO4MB2T+jlpe261FLy0UZHac=; b=1NtA8fmTfb9Yl9ICj8huJdieWt+vJHPea+r26GumXfJp08km4GL6kcit356XlcGnJq LRlXr6j2HT2mDr4y0LMlw5PwIGuOd1TyocMdh4jO7gWeUH9XOjQR4gSgHdkmXnmiqDcS B/hsEnnLHH6l2QadbWA691Dg2LqoobLwAx77MRQnAGioSmeypsQyAnWiDs+8aLb7G49m qwJGryUGn1Cf1PzNi2zApOxjnReyo+Ri+TVRXzaChA/w2HLEv3pbjEJ+/tN/6w6657UU 8lDsyQnqQd40zIYTEH8ZzcrmifSPvEKORDh9jU1Kb4OE3EgGS/qESJTDUQNqMcq3Pl3y NGBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Js0Z6FE46i2fBH0Hde3UO4MB2T+jlpe261FLy0UZHac=; b=Cfth4jXd0KXbOrFogaSMGwpz+bY4covJKXHxMRpLyKCzhqZ2Wm3WExs70N3fS4PFNW cw+4ikok3mrnT8zuPuUXRPNyQr93c/ldGBfbBvjLJtLcLOPbjbMs8ZYy61gS8mptESqR EHF/zLIsenRgSMwscVB7Lyp+1I1SOedc4X+q3cWXSgEfz9WGnBv9WDywnc8cYZ9rxI+V FbVhFQrQMVRf3NNe5LwSuk0X1UHmIBbTRYTs20P/pNJPHkkBm+gCcrLIkUCPN70qWvaO 8qj19x0ilDdK0xnnp4uTTwDUbWXxkSkaCdu9jSaBssn4jWBDfiyHYjDBNcwznel4xJTi kF0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531mw3pHWc/w5G5EAAT55UZtsD6+3G2urqBLVmwAFW7Pjwh1+Mwn jXaUcyuCETsRFPFhVhZ/3PoVxcFvu1XsiaLSFNxGTyKpj1+wXzY6 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx7bKrxNgsM/XxWUvVIac9mB6lFy990wDsiug+4hcKts1Sa5uD9ay6QmnUdzUbwRKHamAC7bFSStvsJ9YUY+E8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:616:: with SMTP id g22mr22364403jar.88.1623189155058; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 14:52:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <98e5e35f-dcca-0b1c-65c1-3da193779b5f@phrozen.org> <95CC2CF3-6EBB-4F8F-AD2C-58E791459E8D@teklibre.net> <701613ff-7a53-267f-77d0-a4e015b8410c@hauke-m.de> <6A2BF4D0-EF5E-4256-AE95-B61F12200BD8@teklibre.net> In-Reply-To: <6A2BF4D0-EF5E-4256-AE95-B61F12200BD8@teklibre.net> From: Nathan Owens Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:52:24 -0700 Message-ID: To: Dave Taht Cc: Hauke Mehrtens , starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fdb02405c4482ca7" Subject: Re: [Starlink] (udm pro) Was: Re: Does the dish run OpenWrt? X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 21:52:36 -0000 --000000000000fdb02405c4482ca7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I found out you can build custom kernels for the UDM Pro. The current one doesn't have CAKE, but it does have FQ_CODEL so I switched to that for now. I'll get around to building a custom kernel in the coming weeks. I'm running pihole and ntopng now: https://github.com/boostchicken/udm-utilities On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 4:04 PM Dave Taht wrote: > hmm, the ubnt udm pro is also built around buildroot. > > Is there some 3rd party software shop out there doing wierd things with > json, etc, leveraging buildroot? I mean=E2=80=A6 angular? come on... > > The udm pro is really great hw, saddled with really crappy software. As > appears to be the dishy=E2=80=A6. I hope one day we could make openwrt ru= n on both. > > > > > On May 16, 2021, at 3:21 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote: > > > > On 5/16/21 10:30 PM, Dave Taht wrote: > >> > https://www.starlink.com/assets/pdfs/Starlink-Open-Source-Components-Lice= nse-Notices.pdf > >> I don=E2=80=99t see any obvious notes to openwrt related modules, nor = dnsmasq. > linux 4.9 seems to be in use. > > > > Thank you for this link. > > It says: "buildroot2017.1" many software components are from the end of > 2016 or the beginning of 2017 which matches the buildroot version. This > does not look like an OpenWrt (fork) or something using the QSDK. > > > > They are using musl libc from 2020 and Linux 4.9. > > > > Did anyone request access to the code for the Open Source Components > used by Starlink? > > They says: > > > You may request access to the code for our Open Source Components > > > through your Starlink account. > > https://www.starlink.com/legal/software-license-and-usage-terms > > > > If so, it would be nice if you could upload the code somewhere. > > > > Hauke > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > --000000000000fdb02405c4482ca7 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I found out you can build custom kernels for the UDM Pro. = The current one doesn't have CAKE, but it does have FQ_CODEL so I switc= hed to that for now. I'll get around to building a custom kernel in the= coming weeks.

I'm running pihole and ntopng now:
https://github.com/boost= chicken/udm-utilities

On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 4:04 PM Dave Taht <davet@teklibre.net&= gt; wrote:
hmm, = the ubnt udm pro is also built around buildroot.

Is there some 3rd party software shop out there doing wierd things with
json, etc, leveraging buildroot? I mean=E2=80=A6 angular? come on...

The udm pro is really great hw, saddled with really crappy software. As app= ears to be the dishy=E2=80=A6. I hope one day we could make openwrt run on = both.



> On May 16, 2021, at 3:21 PM, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> wrote:
>
> On 5/16/21 10:30 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>> htt= ps://www.starlink.com/assets/pdfs/Starlink-Open-Source-Components-License-N= otices.pdf
>> I don=E2=80=99t see any obvious notes to openwrt related modules, = nor dnsmasq. linux 4.9 seems to be in use.
>
> Thank you for this link.
> It says: "buildroot2017.1" many software components are from= the end of 2016 or the beginning of 2017 which matches the buildroot versi= on. This does not look like an OpenWrt (fork) or something using the QSDK.<= br> >
> They are using musl libc from 2020 and Linux 4.9.
>
> Did anyone request access to the code for the Open Source Components u= sed by Starlink?
> They says:
> > You may request access to the code for our Open Source Components=
> > through your Starlink account.
> https://www.starlink.com/legal/s= oftware-license-and-usage-terms
>
> If so, it would be nice if you could upload the code somewhere.
>
> Hauke
> <OpenPGP_0x93DD20630910B515.asc>

_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlin= k@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
--000000000000fdb02405c4482ca7--