From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ua1-x92e.google.com (mail-ua1-x92e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE3743B29D for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 12:46:52 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-ua1-x92e.google.com with SMTP id f13so1432351uab.10 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 09:46:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nathan.io; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9wI3JlZmco4cv/NhgF3dOMkZODFK7q4WJKTs1iDjDE0=; b=yZoEwcFSOjotVb6BG2zVojPoMHfISLH0pzegpcAnxO95wqjjKJ1EfyP3LLeCus4RBv oTzvdXvB2iO6yacvMcjsfr54AJm+lt0DodgfO3FvQpYgGRYYs4gBSUzZNKRekj/rm6ob nH979pXpMFMvFRKkMj0ScctyLpOzWtblg7IBoD0TmA9g88b0gJLICBN3HwRGw2cwSiwY I7u2D4fyaepjnxHq48ncoXfYiZf7qVKCQnLakZw6vM67T9rYlRj5U+yvzk6MsQXoCopP 4DhtLmVw9/HwxhzFG7lwact5XKPDWzFSJox2geExFliOAn41v2i9ssdUeUdJJWp2Hmqh /Sww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9wI3JlZmco4cv/NhgF3dOMkZODFK7q4WJKTs1iDjDE0=; b=PNQ9mQUUUSRCnAj9uPGoFAqhDUnqLfRxe+T58zxD6IskAJvBTFZqkw5mXoemJIIAbG /uyHxlxtE24Gu0WarXNiOnkn0LP/7NksA/rNBPvWBHsVVDYvvZAGJ2bKIExZxoIZgOlS c+/iCnPAHf+8CHe1qvKBGLUsw/G3czn3i+4aOgeaEskAY4nsJzlDaN80LQKLnFZpqGuI eW/MOyiczNKSCWMomjjnDVrFkWXe41gUYpN8l1w8DQzAQG7LqzVjoG6XPUWIk8sFs56v Fdi6lZIvuks7WycF+ppGy2FeySkBCzWF16C73UBew56d1a4H9ixME52+PhMyKUrxd8ML j7KA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530/P9UYnItMefx3Z156nPdzAkeLZfFmwTnZ+AQiNumxwrEexb4b Gf+6eh1imFkyDajS762efq3Vbn9NvDYeGmuH7Idska5V3y8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzL7T3JJbnDOt1Q8uzlMWBaj/ZpFVynb6qvqcZHQlhJRce4sygxDs4uGSQPHxEzRIVEx+byyWt5nbDKjTtU1R0= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:6f47:0:b0:305:9000:f3ac with SMTP id r7-20020ab06f47000000b003059000f3acmr1504834uat.124.1645033612079; Wed, 16 Feb 2022 09:46:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <82154B47-D33C-4BFE-95ED-C5EEFE4220CD@onholyground.com> In-Reply-To: <82154B47-D33C-4BFE-95ED-C5EEFE4220CD@onholyground.com> From: Nathan Owens Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 09:46:41 -0800 Message-ID: To: Darrell Budic Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001788e505d8263c9b" Subject: Re: [Starlink] v6 is back near Chicago, sort of X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 17:46:52 -0000 --0000000000001788e505d8263c9b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If you have working IPv6, it likely means you are on the AS36492 network. If you have no IPv6 and public IP, you are behind AS14593. On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 9:45 AM Darrell Budic wrote: > Looks like V6 got re-enabled for me around 12:30AM CST, didn=E2=80=99t no= tice if > it was related to a firmware upgrade or not. > > Not super exciting, I know, but it doesn=E2=80=99t look like DHCP-pd is c= urrently > operating and my NetworkManger config was freaking out and crashing becau= se > it couldn=E2=80=99t get the -pd assignments. So it broke my starlink for = the > morning, and since NM took the dhclient out with it, the whole dishy look= ed > broken. Sigh, at least it got my attention. > > Anyway, passing it along as an item of interest, not nearly cool as some > of the recent sat discussions have been :) > > -Darrell > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > --0000000000001788e505d8263c9b Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
If you have working IPv6, it likely means you are on the A= S36492 network. If you have no IPv6 and public IP, you are behind AS14593. =

On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 9:45 AM Darrell Budic <budic@onholyground.com> wrote:
Looks like V6 got re-enabled for= me around 12:30AM CST, didn=E2=80=99t notice if it was related to a firmwa= re upgrade or not.

Not super exciting, I know, but it doesn=E2=80=99t look like DHCP-pd is cur= rently operating and my NetworkManger config was freaking out and crashing = because it couldn=E2=80=99t get the -pd assignments. So it broke my starlin= k for the morning, and since NM took the dhclient out with it, the whole di= shy looked broken. Sigh, at least it got my attention.

Anyway, passing it along as an item of interest, not nearly cool as some of= the recent sat discussions have been :)

=C2=A0 -Darrell
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlin= k@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
--0000000000001788e505d8263c9b--