Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Owens <nathan@nathan.io>
To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
	 "starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net"
	<starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] zoomready result
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 06:23:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALjsLJv0TELJYPCuyBKDLr8J_natq5kbpX-A94DPm=HXu1tQrg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DC1714AA-CB8B-432D-94C1-93C94AFFF612@cable.comcast.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1559 bytes --]

Here's mine when I'm not having any issues, pretty decent IMO:

https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=5d18f5f3-74b8-4cad-b7bf-3f5230fb993a

On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 6:32 AM Livingood, Jason <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
wrote:

> When folks experience sub-par video conferencing over Starlink, it'd be
> great to see working latency stats at that time - such as via the easy test
> at https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat.
>
> On 2/23/22, 09:38, "Starlink on behalf of Dave Taht" <
> starlink-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net on behalf of dave.taht@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://blog.tomevslin.com/2022/02/starlinks-zoomready-rating-is-going-down.html__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!TjZjoTCGYO2gkt9xYrGdFrivrejHIdNjVe0TtEsCuQfDJTyNNy4u3_5CxlN2sj8WTA26WA$
>
>     --
>     I tried to build a better future, a few times:
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https*3A*2F*2Fwww.icei.org__;JSUl!!CQl3mcHX2A!TjZjoTCGYO2gkt9xYrGdFrivrejHIdNjVe0TtEsCuQfDJTyNNy4u3_5CxlN2sj-yqmwsLA$
>
>     Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
>     _______________________________________________
>     Starlink mailing list
>     Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!TjZjoTCGYO2gkt9xYrGdFrivrejHIdNjVe0TtEsCuQfDJTyNNy4u3_5CxlN2sj_SP7yVhg$
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3196 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-03-09 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-23 14:37 Dave Taht
2022-03-03 14:31 ` Livingood, Jason
2022-03-03 14:36   ` [Starlink] recent starlink rrul test result Dave Taht
2022-03-03 14:45     ` tom
2022-03-03 15:03       ` Dave Taht
2022-03-03 15:15     ` David Lang
2022-03-03 17:16       ` Nathan Owens
2022-03-03 17:42         ` tom
2022-03-03 20:36         ` David Lang
2022-03-03 20:37           ` David Lang
2022-03-09 14:23   ` Nathan Owens [this message]
2022-03-09 14:57     ` [Starlink] zoomready result Dave Taht
2022-03-09 15:17       ` Nathan Owens
2022-03-11 17:05     ` Luis A. Cornejo
2022-03-11 22:48       ` Nathan Owens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALjsLJv0TELJYPCuyBKDLr8J_natq5kbpX-A94DPm=HXu1tQrg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=nathan@nathan.io \
    --cc=Jason_Livingood@comcast.com \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox