From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B9E13CB41 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 09:38:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id k11so16022505ioa.5 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 06:38:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nathan.io; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gtZqOrtRUbpEmJx/jfjRbZfISlBr5eWDjUKMY2R86Bw=; b=TrWc7EtjeICvjH+/HzxNmD9GQAewGWBJEFICO3fHmZPLehRt36HAhJLInFmb2sO1+J dn+ik4Wg0iiPllJFs6i9bVXhktnBzVdGE0szyTYcIs8bWm1w4SIlzpQEHOti3vCGO+hE VAR3ZCRNLvaP0kR75iVPqpk0zi2m1ABhF/sH76N/kNvjnk6Hc2wOW5eArQ5IphHXklNN P/bUmshP5cd+3GKVIoGgvfdH/CGbSX+03nyPbYWNYMRPugqKL4y7PgsZsUKIm9qkS5Y4 nsHi6Nxahk+FEZJTmUraxta7DZIXY7SmOVu4fKP9dU7AGALL0zLkdSaJHuI1rf/kCK39 2tHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gtZqOrtRUbpEmJx/jfjRbZfISlBr5eWDjUKMY2R86Bw=; b=Kss3X5rE9lReZ8wjgiQxrlk57jyn26SnYa+Dp7/MGnaS/mtydrJXRS5lpMO840uOC8 DEV4xPLpbUejolhSl2Rt4cytivLowyykOmJ/3dOJttkwjoa3cwgbeUNtA2K42nt8z0V/ 9ZB8z0M+0TmizyJD/73+MgENN87fxd+S0fEXD5OxwqhCKNzGhsGb4D+hiJ1iGh/qMb7Y VjWiw13hhT1e6RCR+/VWrt9lE82Lil/OmTa9rnKQCInoAYamVLt/NBIfUTVW4yMgf/W3 jL9HzZjNCjwq3x7LnsVIgtBV43SAD8aWxh/kAWONFE0IKLHA3t391dAZI0+Ic2PXtafb /agA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531VTnLqaQXfkvxsd7oT9Zxtyy5NPMLVQKUZY2xppdtTp9vhylZa 2Ap6AQWswqd9fTrjuT8XV7W4cTRdd5zY5ziK5+q9OMz1TK1DTQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwF15IU5cmJ8i9qIU5nHohm+dvKeI6hgpaKwkIKOJYcNMKJU/rnhQD/3+XKVt29B08IX9ZWeUCyMTBctujBrBw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:120c:: with SMTP id y12mr1623604iot.50.1624714699310; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 06:38:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Nathan Owens Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 06:38:08 -0700 Message-ID: To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000839cdf05c5ab5edc" Subject: [Starlink] Starlink throughput / bufferbloat change? X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 13:38:20 -0000 --000000000000839cdf05c5ab5edc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I'm on vacation, so I can't do a ton of testing, but it seems like in the last ~2 days, my DL speeds are lower (<160Mbps, generally 90-110Mbps), but download-induced bufferbloat is also greatly reduced (Latency generally <60ms, with small spikes up to maybe 150ms more rarely -- much better than to up to 400ms I was seeing before). I confirmed the same behavior with one other list member, has anyone else seen similar? --Nathan --000000000000839cdf05c5ab5edc Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm on vacation, so I can't do a ton of testi= ng, but it seems like in the last ~2 days, my DL speeds are lower (<160M= bps, generally 90-110Mbps), but download-induced bufferbloat is also greatl= y reduced (Latency generally <60ms, with small spikes up to maybe 150ms = more rarely=C2=A0 -- much better than to up to 400ms I was seeing before).<= /div>

I confirmed the same behavior with one other list = member, has anyone else seen similar?=C2=A0

--Nath= an
--000000000000839cdf05c5ab5edc--