From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C5673B2A4 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 22:20:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id k16so20320853ios.10 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 19:20:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nathan.io; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UPMqOkXPWhCd3BRXDZCmpoxm4GJYl4W3UKn61ypeUK4=; b=duUnElUTy3Qz9KDxsPvUb8gVklkRIEXRkldT+ftkS9hq+b6y/Ep05l2BbMdWFZqGtz fK7TEjligulSCSh4Y6VVTO1Wn6aXJ6fMzYH/uZ0cyJEWhtZoKajC1k/3cTBtoeCqc9XT 4f0vmrNV3vpwMIGRQ5tqPVgsewsKl3A2/O4ElOIWYZbGYNsSjHzuYGr8dUTDTYihO8sN RuSykQoVMlQAHscCy2C/la48vcMsnyn0jMY2z2AlhQguBLHo1jGMELaOkvcFpXY9IKVr Dibfiho1uQBQjXj+fji82i5YWCTOcMWVzFnDxstB9LXE093//mtJcVgg7hQFAGXWT5kE bblg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UPMqOkXPWhCd3BRXDZCmpoxm4GJYl4W3UKn61ypeUK4=; b=o5A9wqhS2W69simpipE4EWnJmDId2ZOHeDqt5MrKkmU6wHIBrI1IxajC1GVrAIqXVq d8RSta1MVc3fSPofYXLQ5UINQmsFUto/h8VTjfEAs9nL5p/ZfqZATC4+tVEgCWJLUAOB zyOpjHJzILFUw9nhFfjm9Q+3GTSce4g17TQKDp/7mJRYXA+eVhUQQ7OxjKuCa7yKrhVb 4H738tmQt77QOBJcexUFevl1sFCoECDasVgV6epJ4+EBN+CPK+9gWWUgS3gA3xdfPb7m eo4qzleLUm4nOJ3ZEOTYpBL14GaAdpNCGldYFm+BvATg7V7fi6JBLufg40FEvdRLN3B9 sV7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5316Vj0uWTKuV3mRrw4p/3VNHg2LOnqTQWDw21SOHQQfd376yQR2 cAbkxf1KrJt32Gh5Ee1rGlqyk2aRzpdzyFeYAI5vXA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw6+6tnE4I9M/2MX4wZOq0ZJHNSL2NzOABsh1bzgoxoWnydq0wzgASjPZ0DWIz/kKh3gbkhmaSjO84WEbOHhL4= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:a901:: with SMTP id c1mr11854567iod.29.1624846834395; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 19:20:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7664DBDE-5049-498A-9C40-4CF17FA2D488@puck.nether.net> In-Reply-To: From: Nathan Owens Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 20:20:23 -0600 Message-ID: To: Darrell Budic Cc: Dave Taht , starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000061016405c5ca2278" Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink throughput / bufferbloat change? X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 02:20:35 -0000 --00000000000061016405c5ca2278 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My dish has not been upgraded yet, I'm still on a4908729-5051-4d3b-aacc-446ef9b26cdc.uterm.release My "obstructed" seconds keep creeping up, was 0 for a while, then 0-4s for a while, now up to ~55s On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 7:26 PM Darrell Budic wrote: > Hey Dave, how=E2=80=99d those tests look yesterday (sqm enabled though) v= s today > (disabled)? Looks like my dishy upgraded to > > 4990ce8d-5028-4e51-a015-e9ab1b1ebe1a.uterm.release > > around 4:30AM CDT this morning. > > Nathan, did you get a chance to check versions or uptime? Probably worth > tracking if we=E2=80=99re looking for performance changes. > > On Jun 26, 2021, at 9:24 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > > > I have fired off a new string of tests. should be done in an hour. > > I don't know if budic has sqm on or off at the moment. > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 7:10 AM Jared Mauch wrote= : > > > I will be able to test perhaps in 6-10 hours as I'll be getting the syste= m > online hopefully. > > Sent from my TI-99/4a > > On Jun 26, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Nathan Owens wrote: > > =EF=BB=BF > I'm on vacation, so I can't do a ton of testing, but it seems like in the > last ~2 days, my DL speeds are lower (<160Mbps, generally 90-110Mbps), bu= t > download-induced bufferbloat is also greatly reduced (Latency generally > <60ms, with small spikes up to maybe 150ms more rarely -- much better th= an > to up to 400ms I was seeing before). > > I confirmed the same behavior with one other list member, has anyone else > seen similar? > > --Nathan > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > > > > > -- > Latest Podcast: > https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6791014284936785920/ > > Dave T=C3=A4ht CTO, TekLibre, LLC > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > --00000000000061016405c5ca2278 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
My dish has not been upgraded yet, I'= ;m still on a4908729-5051-4d3b-aacc-446ef9b26cdc.uterm.release

My "obstructed" seconds keep creeping u= p, was 0 for a while, then 0-4s for a while, now up to ~55s

On Su= n, Jun 27, 2021 at 7:26 PM Darrell Budic <budic@onholyground.com> wrote:
Hey Dave, how=E2=80=99d those tests look yesterday (sqm enabled though) vs= today (disabled)? Looks like my dishy upgraded to=C2=A0

4990ce8d-5028-4e51-a0= 15-e9ab1b1ebe1a.uterm.release

around 4:30AM CDT this morning.
<= span style=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0);font-family:-apple-system,BlinkMacSystemFont= ,"Segoe UI",Roboto,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:14px;whit= e-space:pre-wrap;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">
<= span style=3D"background-color:rgb(255,255,255)">Nathan, d= id you get a chance to check versions or uptime? Probably worth tracking if= we=E2=80=99re looking for performance changes.
<= div>
On Jun 26, 2021, at 9:24 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wro= te:

I have fired off= a new string of tests. should be done in an hour.

I don't know = if budic has sqm on or off at the moment.

On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 7:= 10 AM Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
I will be able to test perhaps in 6-10 hours as I'll be getting the sy= stem online hopefully.

Sent from my TI-99/4a

On Jun 26, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Nathan Owens <nathan@nathan.io> wrote:

= =EF=BB=BF
I'm on vacation, so I can't do a ton of testing, but i= t seems like in the last ~2 days, my DL speeds are lower (<160Mbps, gene= rally 90-110Mbps), but download-induced bufferbloat is also greatly reduced= (Latency generally <60ms, with small spikes up to maybe 150ms more rare= ly =C2=A0-- much better than to up to 400ms I was seeing before).

I = confirmed the same behavior with one other list member, has anyone else see= n similar?

--Nathan
_____________________________________________= __
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://li= sts.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
_________________= ______________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbl= oat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink



--
Latest Podcast:
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6791014284936785920= /

Dave T=C3=A4ht CTO, TekLibre, LLC
_________________________= ______________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net<= /a>
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

____________________________________= ___________
Starlink mailing list
Starlin= k@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink --00000000000061016405c5ca2278--