From: Craig Polk <c.polk@comsoc.org>
To: Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
5grm-satellite@ieee.org
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink in Northern Europe: A New Look at Stationary and In-motion Performance
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 14:36:14 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANHswaOoZg8wiaTL26Fr4w8pJSYe9Hg=XVe2KKiVs=m-8i3miQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFvDQ9r323VwjjEb0Z7zoRKLF6g3p7fVBXw2HdpRWnvZ3uz2qA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1873 bytes --]
Hesham,
Is this your paper? Are you submitting it for the WG to review as a
possible INGR Topic article?
Best regards,
Craig
----
Craig Polk, MSEE, MBA
Program Manager
Future Networks Tech Community | futurenetworks.ieee.org
3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10016
Office: +1 212-705-8926 | Mobile: +1 908-255-6568
Email: c.polk@comsoc.org
Future Networks World Forum | https://fnwf.ieee.org/
Connecting the Unconnected | https://ctu.ieee.org/
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025, 12:01 AM Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com>
wrote:
> This paper [1] This paper evaluates the Flat High Performance (FHP)
> terminal's performance in Finland, Northern Europe.
>
> *Abstract*
> "Starlink has introduced the Flat High Performance (FHP) terminal,
> specifically designed to support the vehicles and the vessels in motion as
> well as the high-demand stationary users. The research on FHP terminal
> throughput analysis remains limited, only a few existing studies evaluate
> FHP, focusing on the limited parameters and scenarios. This paper evaluates
> the FHP terminal's performance in Finland, Northern Europe. We examine
> round-trip time (RTT), uplink, and downlink throughput for both stationary
> and in-motion use. We measure network efficiency across six geographically
> diverse servers and get insights of network routing strategies. Our results
> show that Starlink provides high-speed, low-RTT connectivity, however, the
> throughput experiences fluctuations with slight degradation when in motion.
> Additionally, we compare Starlink and terrestrial network RTT and possible
> routing paths."
>
> Hesham
> [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15552
> ------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the 5GRM-SATELLITE list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=5GRM-SATELLITE&A=1
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2749 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-27 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-27 5:00 Hesham ElBakoury
2025-02-27 14:18 ` Sascha Meinrath
2025-02-27 14:36 ` Craig Polk [this message]
2025-02-27 15:04 ` Hesham ElBakoury
2025-02-27 21:02 ` Ulrich Speidel
2025-02-28 3:40 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2025-02-28 4:22 ` Ulrich Speidel
2025-02-28 4:57 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANHswaOoZg8wiaTL26Fr4w8pJSYe9Hg=XVe2KKiVs=m-8i3miQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=c.polk@comsoc.org \
--cc=5grm-satellite@ieee.org \
--cc=helbakoury@gmail.com \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox