From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oa1-x36.google.com (mail-oa1-x36.google.com [IPv6:2001:4860:4864:20::36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25A623B29E for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 09:36:14 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-oa1-x36.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2b3680e548aso901765fac.0 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 06:36:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comsoc-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1740666973; x=1741271773; darn=lists.bufferbloat.net; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GrNuCSCWv0HHS7PPl2RUXfKcne8gb6aPqjaerm+TyoI=; b=R97Dko1T8hmWYzUEh5YqVaHfzrLLvH7pNcZmpuyJKnzR5q0+a0tYxLx+FLsdmCLlxU wUps7rGwVJRjed0UHufy9ooKePO64bsuVcuyB11xhqKs8q2zTm04KjxacJUwVCKQBusX Lw4cOEf5Ovx0sgzjYGFl9nxV3pyPMASUqLoB46enPGoXxvJW20igDVxXM9wQNYvnLCfL BTF3LEH+Xh9EP1vuo7VZfH2c0GPIMiXjHOtL4N/k5g406sjcBIUh9BiiipO1xZuSHWwD PyCBnSvjUR4O3S9a5rCIsHn51qLFs+eA+boEscKQVESxh6s+DTLKZzXQgty2/rSsg3em YNJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740666973; x=1741271773; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=GrNuCSCWv0HHS7PPl2RUXfKcne8gb6aPqjaerm+TyoI=; b=qeWkJLS6a3ySmRfVZXsdPfBKNrbbKG03KNyfYtpCQQQiwtbY6Z6VF4H3k1A3gWQD0h 4ddWev8OdqbtWCJ+wQKrR9ZBkB9J0PrydQXwExgweViEVJcbOb65iGTU/dfbEJmeFH4A zX+3L2ZUtiPn6cuOMof4ahuwMTclPkjlVZ2p39PNXEvHYFPuJ8KUigGgIhUsZotc5y70 2rxRrXEXs7uVRbz0uaCy/2lSBTiDN8/jhxIvxieojgOIGE7GA6TcThKP8Zjh31m45RF5 vYKH0e0Jna1f2k9FE8l8I3cJYu7q3j27FDA/G0tIAFlTfYw2h7t88qddVfJ6kSeCUpZ2 6uEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxeaVqxXzLsyWitQLtKHy3zvxIlNxJp4IopPhSxDehWwh1KddUM /qMXYcM2BvP60oUhgtc4ApFCtg1nOsZ2RojW7uooMzu9O9/qbTualtPtUDcBf1R7DQdOr7n2P+s l0MKW6OWycVVwMxuLorrhgkEiSBdVsLJm8/PV X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvjrnvxC4zJ+Miey38gO7nDzyXuHSLzW2WonHXL/6Gmfv+/KLlJpiW/Z6hHzcH 9KNR1RY3P/qK3LeBgqtah5k011DalB5qH7EiuLmOXbeKqvm36PAwkIjcwyUuCcce3zYroY+Eh/o OeSLBfKJFaBtcMXaUIiHYFGP5ntzTRHTeHCM8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHW2XBhQrli5R5E/whaTy/UVJXU2uH3HNQi5mlSicRlvl1w15ep4pQ1jrjVHG26xIqKRqmh6sHn00TllIV/Fd8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:f14f:b0:2c1:4827:c0e1 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-2c15586b622mr2055318fac.17.1740666973434; Thu, 27 Feb 2025 06:36:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Craig Polk X-Gm-Features: AQ5f1JpQiZNZMnJyXjb-DB5qF7X-MW4NEOGBDKWImsMvaTt_Ebb9nDfRPS_bLrk Message-ID: To: Hesham ElBakoury Cc: Dave Taht via Starlink , 5grm-satellite@ieee.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009fd6e9062f209cb2" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 06 Jun 2025 06:48:29 -0400 Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink in Northern Europe: A New Look at Stationary and In-motion Performance X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 14:36:14 -0000 X-Original-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 09:34:54 -0500 X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2025 14:36:14 -0000 --0000000000009fd6e9062f209cb2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hesham, Is this your paper? Are you submitting it for the WG to review as a possible INGR Topic article? Best regards, Craig ---- Craig Polk, MSEE, MBA Program Manager Future Networks Tech Community | futurenetworks.ieee.org 3 Park Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10016 Office: +1 212-705-8926 | Mobile: +1 908-255-6568 Email: c.polk@comsoc.org Future Networks World Forum | https://fnwf.ieee.org/ Connecting the Unconnected | https://ctu.ieee.org/ On Thu, Feb 27, 2025, 12:01=E2=80=AFAM Hesham ElBakoury wrote: > This paper [1] This paper evaluates the Flat High Performance (FHP) > terminal's performance in Finland, Northern Europe. > > *Abstract* > "Starlink has introduced the Flat High Performance (FHP) terminal, > specifically designed to support the vehicles and the vessels in motion a= s > well as the high-demand stationary users. The research on FHP terminal > throughput analysis remains limited, only a few existing studies evaluate > FHP, focusing on the limited parameters and scenarios. This paper evaluat= es > the FHP terminal's performance in Finland, Northern Europe. We examine > round-trip time (RTT), uplink, and downlink throughput for both stationar= y > and in-motion use. We measure network efficiency across six geographicall= y > diverse servers and get insights of network routing strategies. Our resul= ts > show that Starlink provides high-speed, low-RTT connectivity, however, th= e > throughput experiences fluctuations with slight degradation when in motio= n. > Additionally, we compare Starlink and terrestrial network RTT and possibl= e > routing paths." > > Hesham > [1] https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.15552 > ------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from the 5GRM-SATELLITE list, click the following link: > https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=3D5GRM-SATELLITE&A=3D1 > --0000000000009fd6e9062f209cb2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hesham,

Is this your paper? Are you submitting it for the WG to review as a = possible INGR Topic article?

Best regards,
Craig

----
Craig Polk, MSEE, MBAProgram Manager
Future Networks Tech Community | futurenetworks.ieee.org
3 Park Avenue, 17th F= loor, New York, NY 10016=C2=A0
Office: +1 212-705-8926 | Mobile: +1 908= -255-6568
Email: c.polk@comsoc.org=
Future Networks World Forum | h= ttps://fnwf.ieee.org/
Connecting the Unconnected | https://ctu.ieee.org/

On T= hu, Feb 27, 2025, 12:01=E2=80=AFAM Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com> wrote:
This paper [1] This paper evaluates= the Flat High Performance (FHP) terminal's performance in Finland, Nor= thern Europe.

Abstract
"Starlink has introduced the Flat High P= erformance (FHP) terminal, specifically designed to support the vehicles an= d the vessels in motion as well as the high-demand stationary users. The re= search on FHP terminal throughput analysis remains limited, only a few exis= ting studies evaluate FHP, focusing on the limited parameters and scenarios= . This paper evaluates the FHP terminal's performance in Finland, North= ern Europe. We examine round-trip time (RTT), uplink, and downlink throughp= ut for both stationary and in-motion use. We measure network efficiency acr= oss six geographically diverse servers and get insights of network routing = strategies. Our results show that Starlink provides high-speed, low-RTT con= nectivity, however, the throughput experiences fluctuations with slight deg= radation when in motion. Additionally, we compare Starlink and terrestrial = network RTT and possible routing paths."

To unsubscribe from the 5GRM-SATELLITE list, click the following link: = https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-= bin/wa?SUBED1=3D5GRM-SATELLITE&A=3D1

--0000000000009fd6e9062f209cb2--