From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.onholyground.com (mail.onholyground.com [204.130.133.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D9E33B2A4 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 21:26:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (castleinthewoods.onholyground.com [204.130.133.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.onholyground.com (8.14.9/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 15S1QXse010174 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 27 Jun 2021 20:26:34 -0500 From: Darrell Budic Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A8124416-97A8-4BD1-BDD5-D4D4A83AED30" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\)) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 20:26:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net To: Dave Taht References: <7664DBDE-5049-498A-9C40-4CF17FA2D488@puck.nether.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mail.onholyground.com [204.130.133.20]); Sun, 27 Jun 2021 20:26:34 -0500 (CDT) X-Spam-Checked: This message probably not SPAM (-2.583) X-Spam-Tests: ALL_TRUSTED, BAYES_00, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD, HTML_MESSAGE, SO_PUB_URIBL_NS_40, TXREP X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink throughput / bufferbloat change? X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 01:26:36 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_A8124416-97A8-4BD1-BDD5-D4D4A83AED30 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hey Dave, how=E2=80=99d those tests look yesterday (sqm enabled though) = vs today (disabled)? Looks like my dishy upgraded to=20 4990ce8d-5028-4e51-a015-e9ab1b1ebe1a.uterm.release around 4:30AM CDT this morning. Nathan, did you get a chance to check versions or uptime? Probably worth = tracking if we=E2=80=99re looking for performance changes. On Jun 26, 2021, at 9:24 AM, Dave Taht wrote: >=20 > I have fired off a new string of tests. should be done in an hour. >=20 > I don't know if budic has sqm on or off at the moment. >=20 > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 7:10 AM Jared Mauch = wrote: >>=20 >> I will be able to test perhaps in 6-10 hours as I'll be getting the = system online hopefully. >>=20 >> Sent from my TI-99/4a >>=20 >>> On Jun 26, 2021, at 9:38 AM, Nathan Owens wrote: >>>=20 >>> =EF=BB=BF >>> I'm on vacation, so I can't do a ton of testing, but it seems like = in the last ~2 days, my DL speeds are lower (<160Mbps, generally = 90-110Mbps), but download-induced bufferbloat is also greatly reduced = (Latency generally <60ms, with small spikes up to maybe 150ms more = rarely -- much better than to up to 400ms I was seeing before). >>>=20 >>> I confirmed the same behavior with one other list member, has anyone = else seen similar? >>>=20 >>> --Nathan >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Starlink mailing list >>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlink mailing list >> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Latest Podcast: > = https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6791014284936785920/ >=20 > Dave T=C3=A4ht CTO, TekLibre, LLC > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink --Apple-Mail=_A8124416-97A8-4BD1-BDD5-D4D4A83AED30 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Hey = Dave, how=E2=80=99d those tests look yesterday (sqm enabled though) vs = today (disabled)? Looks like my dishy upgraded to 
4990ce8d-5028-4e51-a015-e9ab1b1ebe1a.uterm.release
=

around 4:30AM CDT this = morning.

Nathan, did you get a chance to check versions or uptime? = Probably worth tracking if we=E2=80=99re looking for performance = changes.

On Jun 26, 2021, at 9:24 AM, Dave Taht = <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

I = have fired off a new string of tests. should be done in an hour.

I don't know if budic has sqm on or off at the = moment.

On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 7:10 AM = Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:

I will be able to test perhaps = in 6-10 hours as I'll be getting the system online hopefully.

Sent from my TI-99/4a

On Jun 26, 2021, at 9:38 = AM, Nathan Owens <nathan@nathan.io> wrote:

=EF=BB=BF
I'm on vacation, so I can't do a ton = of testing, but it seems like in the last ~2 days, my DL speeds are = lower (<160Mbps, generally 90-110Mbps), but download-induced = bufferbloat is also greatly reduced (Latency generally <60ms, with = small spikes up to maybe 150ms more rarely  -- much better than to = up to 400ms I was seeing before).

I = confirmed the same behavior with one other list member, has anyone else = seen similar?

--Nathan
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
_______________________________________________Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink



-- =
Latest Podcast:
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6791014284= 936785920/

Dave T=C3=A4ht CTO, = TekLibre, LLC
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

= --Apple-Mail=_A8124416-97A8-4BD1-BDD5-D4D4A83AED30--