Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Cc: "Dave Täht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
	"starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net" <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink hidden buffers
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 20:45:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E9CD7D6C-FB48-41D9-9917-ADDC0FF9F540@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2933754.1684953035@dyas>

Hi Michael,

> On May 24, 2023, at 20:30, Michael Richardson via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Could fq_codel emit flow statistics as a side-effect of it's
>>> classifications?
> 
>> It does. It always has. "tc -s class show" gives details of each queue.
> 
> Good.
> Just a question of hooking up luci to that.

	Keep in mind by default fq_codel uses 1024 hash bins, so worst case your GUI needs to display quite a lot of units; on the other hand many flows are really short, and the "tc -s class show" has little "hysteresis" that is once a hash bin runs empty, fq_codel will not report data for that bin. (Which is fine as empty buckets tend to be not very informative, but when using this output to feed a display tool now your sampling/query rate might be too coarse and not show ephemeral buckets).


> 
>> There are some really cool things you can do at high sample rates.
>> Here is a live/realtime movie of what netflix actually looks like:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-2oSBr2200 (also) Another thing is
> 
> A movie about people watching movies :-)

	And a "silent move" at that, very meta and very old school ;)

> I wonder about the privacy implications of doing this at an ISP.

	I think keeping the full 5-tuple input to the hash function might be problematic, but "reducing" that to the 10bit bucket-ID should be lossy enough, no?

Regards
	Sebastian

P.S.: for cake luci statistics has grown a module that plots the outputs of `tc -s qdisc` for cake instances over time. Sure that is not the per-flow or per hash-bin resolution, but for quickly seeing whether there is on-going high level marking/dropping it should suffice...


> 
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-24 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-13 10:10 Ulrich Speidel
2023-05-13 11:20 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-05-13 12:16   ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-05-13 23:00     ` David Lang
2023-05-13 22:57 ` David Lang
2023-05-14  6:06   ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-05-14  6:55     ` David Lang
2023-05-14  8:43       ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-05-14  9:00         ` David Lang
2023-05-15  2:41           ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-05-15  3:33             ` David Lang
2023-05-15  6:36               ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-05-15 11:07                 ` David Lang
2023-05-24 12:55               ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-05-24 13:44                 ` Dave Taht
2023-05-24 14:05                   ` David Lang
2023-05-24 14:49                   ` Michael Richardson
2023-05-24 15:09                     ` Dave Collier-Brown
2023-05-24 15:31                     ` Dave Taht
2023-05-24 18:30                       ` Michael Richardson
2023-05-24 18:45                         ` Sebastian Moeller [this message]
2023-05-24 13:59                 ` David Lang
2023-05-24 22:39                   ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-05-25  0:06                     ` David Lang
2023-07-27 20:37                     ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-05-24 15:18                 ` Mark Handley
2023-05-24 21:50                   ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-05-25  0:17                     ` David Lang
2023-05-14  9:06         ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-05-14  9:13           ` David Lang
2023-05-14  9:57 ` Oleg Kutkov
2023-05-14  9:59   ` Oleg Kutkov
2023-05-24 15:26 ` Bjørn Ivar Teigen
2023-05-24 21:53   ` Ulrich Speidel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E9CD7D6C-FB48-41D9-9917-ADDC0FF9F540@gmx.de \
    --to=moeller0@gmx.de \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=mcr@sandelman.ca \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox