From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.nextlayer.at (smtp2.nextlayer.at [IPv6:2a01:190:1764:150::37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ED623B2A4 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 22:16:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.49] (d50-117-141-56.yt.northwestel.net [50.117.141.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.nextlayer.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5C23801D5C for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 04:16:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.nextlayer.at D5C23801D5C To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <4XxOdTE7SSKV1PSkdhm_Ng@geopod-ismtpd-3-0> From: Daniel AJ Sokolov Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 19:16:10 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100411 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Starlink] ordered my dishy!! X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 02:16:15 -0000 On 2021-06-24 at 6:36 p.m., Nathan Owens wrote: > The newer dish model pulls closer to 65-70W, fwiw. Might pull more in snow > melt mode That is still significant. About 600 kWh a year, which would cost me about USD 66. Plus all the electricity required for snow/ice melt - of which I'll need a lot, given that I live North of 60°. YMMV, depending on your cost of electricity. Daniel