From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.nextlayer.at (smtp2.nextlayer.at [IPv6:2a01:190:1764:150::37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D76653CB43 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 18:16:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [172.31.253.102] (guestkeeper.heise.de [193.99.145.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.nextlayer.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A6B878038B4 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2022 00:16:09 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.nextlayer.at A6B878038B4 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 15:16:06 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100411 Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Content-Language: en-GB To: Benjamin Henrion via Starlink References: From: Daniel AJ Sokolov In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Starlink] No RDOF-Funds for Starlink X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 22:16:12 -0000 On 2022-08-22 at 13:28, David Lang wrote: > I thought I had read that they were upset over the $500 up front cost of > starlink more than anything else. That was a political comment by the FCC-Chairwoman, but is not part of the FCC Public Notice. Legally, other shortcomings are better arguments to deny the funding. And nobody would be surprised if SpaceX went to court over this. BR Daniel AJ