From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lang.hm (unknown [66.167.227.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7032D3B2A4 for ; Sat, 8 Jul 2023 16:49:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (syslog [10.0.0.100]) by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF77719C3DE; Sat, 8 Jul 2023 13:49:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2023 13:49:38 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: Dave Taht cc: Ulrich Speidel , "blakangel@gmail.com" , "starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net" , Daniel AJ Sokolov In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <114eabbd-cf5b-1c08-8226-fbf53455d9ea@falco.ca> <6p3296pr-96n3-8p77-ps68-25155r16o365@ynat.uz> <32d09d76-7aa6-a469-9539-d02a9fa9c7f3@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Starlink] orbital maneuvers 12 per sat in the last 6 months X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2023 20:49:41 -0000 On Sat, 8 Jul 2023, Dave Taht wrote: > A followon thought is possibly, as satellites are de-orbited would it > be possible to take some debris down with them in some way? not easily, you would have to collide/dock with the debris to change their orbit, and that's more likely to break off more parts than to catch things to de-orbit. david Lang