From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Dave Taht <davet@teklibre.net>
Cc: David Lang <david@lang.hm>, starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] 69,000 Users
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 20:33:24 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2106302031320.13354@uplift.swm.pp.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5E2A258B-4C5F-476E-A61D-1267993C50FB@teklibre.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 621 bytes --]
On Wed, 30 Jun 2021, Dave Taht wrote:
> I don’t think data caps are needed. fairness is needed.
LTE has pretty good airtime fairness (but FIFO per customer). Still
doesn't work very well when there isn't enough airtime to satisfy demand.
> I would prefer a solution that just billed for usage over a minimum.
Well, data caps is similar to this. People generally don't like to get
billed automatically upon higher usage, thus data caps can be used and
people will have to go to some self-service page and "pay more" if they're
over the cap, to get a higher cap.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-30 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-30 2:00 Daniel AJ Sokolov
2021-06-30 5:24 ` David Lang
2021-06-30 5:48 ` Dave Taht
2021-06-30 7:13 ` [Starlink] routing capability in starlinks Dave Taht
2021-06-30 14:43 ` Michael Richardson
2021-06-30 23:56 ` Nick Buraglio
2021-06-30 7:23 ` [Starlink] 69,000 Users Mike Puchol
2021-06-30 7:30 ` David Lang
2021-06-30 7:43 ` Mike Puchol
2021-06-30 7:51 ` Dave Taht
2021-06-30 9:57 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2021-06-30 14:24 ` Dave Taht
2021-06-30 18:33 ` Mikael Abrahamsson [this message]
2021-06-30 20:40 ` Dick Roy
2021-06-30 23:33 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2021-07-01 0:00 ` David Lang
2021-07-01 0:03 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2021-07-01 0:20 ` David Lang
2021-06-30 10:53 ` Jared Mauch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.2106302031320.13354@uplift.swm.pp.se \
--to=swmike@swm.pp.se \
--cc=davet@teklibre.net \
--cc=david@lang.hm \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox