From: David Collier-Brown <davec-b@rogers.com>
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Starlink] Re: Amazon Leo announcing up to 1 Gbps (DOWN) and 400 Mbps (UP)
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 20:26:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1b55489-980b-419d-b398-32b6391abe4e@rogers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <rs617242-32n8-pq57-sp99-n882sp053s6q@ynat.uz>
Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>> One use case from northern canada that I'm aware is the 9am login at
>> government offices. Lots of bandwidth needed to do all that
>> ActiveDirectory
>> profile replication/update for all the people doing this at the same
>> time.
>> I've heard stories of it taking an hour for everyone to get logged in.
>> AD replication ought to solve this, but apparently, it doesn't for
>> reasons I
>> don't understand.
On 12/8/25 15:57, David Lang via Starlink wrote:
> microsoft protocols are not wan friendly, they do lots of round trips.
> There are wan accelerator middle boxes that short-cut the protocols.
> It's not just the AD lookups, it's filesystem queries as well.
MS is really /really/ bad at handling anything bigger/more-laggy than
the original token-ring and ethernet LANs. In the case of SMB, people
built local caching/middleware boxes using Samba to get the RTT down.
They're the first folks who taught me that it's latency, not bandwidth.
--dave
--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
davecb@spamcop.net | -- Mark Twain
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-09 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-06 15:36 [Starlink] Amazon Leo announcing up to 1 Gbps (DOWN) and 400 Mbps (UP) Frantisek Borsik
2025-12-06 16:36 ` [Starlink] " J Pan
2025-12-06 23:58 ` David Lang
2025-12-07 0:02 ` Inemesit Affia
2025-12-07 0:08 ` David Lang
2025-12-08 4:31 ` Inemesit Affia
[not found] ` <5098.1765221714@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
2025-12-08 20:57 ` David Lang
[not found] ` <2609.1765228007@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
2025-12-08 21:15 ` David Lang
2025-12-08 21:22 ` Michael Kan
2025-12-08 23:19 ` Inemesit Affia
2025-12-08 23:20 ` Inemesit Affia
2025-12-08 23:33 ` David Lang
2025-12-09 1:26 ` David Collier-Brown [this message]
2025-12-09 7:49 ` Frantisek Borsik
2025-12-09 8:11 ` Inemesit Affia
2025-12-09 8:23 ` Frantisek Borsik
2025-12-09 8:21 ` Inemesit Affia
2025-12-09 8:29 ` Inemesit Affia
2025-12-09 21:53 ` Frantisek Borsik
2025-12-10 1:06 ` Nick Matthews
2025-12-10 1:24 ` Frantisek Borsik
2025-12-10 1:45 ` Joe Hamelin
2025-12-09 13:23 ` Livingood, Jason
2025-12-09 21:33 ` David Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b1b55489-980b-419d-b398-32b6391abe4e@rogers.com \
--to=davec-b@rogers.com \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox