From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] successful drone attack on starlink terminal
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 14:36:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4a9f117-db35-4c9f-8dd6-696eb45ac4e4@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d59ac7a9-a41f-4ced-978e-701bb514a11b@gmail.com>
Le 23/02/2024 à 14:23, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit :
>
>
> Le 23/02/2024 à 13:04, Dave Taht via Starlink a écrit :
>> https://twitter.com/Megaconstellati/status/1760996758363029734
>>
>> In general, two can play at this game, and given the low cost and
>> good range, and relative ease of building a sensor for the
>> starlink frequencies, I see starlinks fading from the battlefield.
>> For that matter, nearly every form of electronic communication, be
>> it wifi, or 5G. Fiber or laser will be used instead.
>
> But laser could be blinded by counter-lasers, fiber could be cut by
> scissors, etc.
>
> Measures, counter-measures, counter-counter-measures and so on,
> equally well on each of these media.
A way forward could be to induce equilibrium rather than
instability-increase albeit breakthrough technologies.
More equilibrium might(?) come from suggesting that all starlink be made
equally available to all parties (like Internet is), but that certainly
sounds as a crazy proposal in the current context of sanctions, even if
people do agree that Internet should stay up equally well for all.
So, I dont know.
It's just that it looks very dangerous what is happening there.
Alex
>
> Alex
>
>>
>> See also the flipper zero.
>>
>> https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/02/canada-vows-to-ban-flipper-zero-device-in-crackdown-on-car-theft/
>
>>
_______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-23 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-23 12:04 Dave Taht
2024-02-23 13:23 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2024-02-23 13:36 ` Alexandre Petrescu [this message]
2024-02-23 18:13 ` Eugene Chang
2024-02-23 18:31 ` Dave Collier-Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b4a9f117-db35-4c9f-8dd6-696eb45ac4e4@gmail.com \
--to=alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox