From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EE603B2A4 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:36:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 41NDalHm018278 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 14:36:47 +0100 Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id B2F182040A3 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 14:36:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA70A204010 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 14:36:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.8.32.70] (is156570.intra.cea.fr [10.8.32.70]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 41NDalEf040711 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 14:36:47 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 14:36:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: fr To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net References: From: Alexandre Petrescu In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CEA-Virus: SOPHOS_SAVI_ERROR_OLD_VIRUS_DATA Subject: Re: [Starlink] successful drone attack on starlink terminal X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 13:36:49 -0000 Le 23/02/2024 à 14:23, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink a écrit : > > > Le 23/02/2024 à 13:04, Dave Taht via Starlink a écrit : >> https://twitter.com/Megaconstellati/status/1760996758363029734 >> >> In general, two can play at this game, and given the low cost and >> good range, and relative ease of building a sensor for the >> starlink frequencies, I see starlinks fading from the battlefield. >> For that matter, nearly every form of electronic communication, be >> it wifi, or 5G. Fiber or laser will be used instead. > > But laser could be blinded by counter-lasers, fiber could be cut by > scissors, etc. > > Measures, counter-measures, counter-counter-measures and so on, > equally well on each of these media. A way forward could be to induce equilibrium rather than instability-increase albeit breakthrough technologies. More equilibrium might(?) come from suggesting that all starlink be made equally available to all parties (like Internet is), but that certainly sounds as a crazy proposal in the current context of sanctions, even if people do agree that Internet should stay up equally well for all. So, I dont know. It's just that it looks very dangerous what is happening there. Alex > > Alex > >> >> See also the flipper zero. >> >> https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/02/canada-vows-to-ban-flipper-zero-device-in-crackdown-on-car-theft/ > >> _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink