From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cskpmok@caida.org>
Received: from rommie.caida.org (rommie.caida.org [192.172.226.78])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4354F3B29D
 for <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 21:23:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by rommie.caida.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67D8D2C1665
 for <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 18:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
From: Ricky Mok <cskpmok@caida.org>
Message-ID: <b7902035-303a-f91f-884c-f7da7675aa40@caida.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 18:23:52 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Subject: [Starlink] a paper on comparing LEO broadband systems
X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." <starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/starlink>,
 <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/starlink>
List-Post: <mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink>,
 <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 01:23:56 -0000

http://systemarchitect.mit.edu/docs/pachler21a.pdf

I think the paper is a bit high level, not much about their performance.

Ricky