From: Mike Puchol <mike@starlink.sx>
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink "beam spread"
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:59:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <be8f4d46-f310-4bf4-ade5-2744f301b4ca@Spark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8978587-42op-q175-2o41-qq9p4491459s@ynat.uz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1500 bytes --]
On this particular one, the gateway beams are extremely narrow, around 1.5º to 2.5º. SpaceX is working on “mega-gateways” where 32 antennas will co-exist. They are also deploying a new gateway design with a larger antenna, and thus narrower beamwidth and more gain, allowing for a considerable reduction in TX power.
Best,
Mike
On Aug 31, 2022, 09:33 +0200, David Lang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>, wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2022, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink wrote:
>
> > This combines with the uncomfortable truth
> > that an RF "beam" from a satellite isn't as selective as a laser beam,
> > so the options for frequency re-use from orbit aren't anywhere near as
> > good as from a mobile base station across the road: Any beam pointed at
> > you can be heard for many miles around and therefore no other user can
> > re-use that frequency (with the same burst slot etc.).
>
> not quite, you are forgetting that the antennas on the ground are also steerable
> arrays and so they can focus their 'receiving beam' at different satellites.
> This is less efficient than a transmitting beam as the satellites you aren't
> 'pointed' at will increase your noise floor, but it does allow the same
> frequency to be used for multiple satellites into the same area at the same
> time.
>
> David Lang
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2080 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-31 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.3.1661875202.32670.starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2022-08-30 16:53 ` David P. Reed
2022-08-30 17:32 ` Doc Searls
2022-08-30 20:09 ` Mike Puchol
2022-08-30 20:35 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2022-08-30 20:40 ` Mike Puchol
2022-08-30 21:09 ` David Lang
2022-08-30 21:01 ` David Lang
2022-08-30 22:07 ` Brandon Butterworth
2022-08-30 22:21 ` David Lang
2022-08-30 22:37 ` Brandon Butterworth
2022-08-30 23:07 ` David Lang
2022-08-30 23:45 ` Brandon Butterworth
2022-08-30 23:28 ` David P. Reed
2022-08-31 0:12 ` David Lang
2022-08-31 0:31 ` Dave Taht
2022-08-31 0:32 ` David P. Reed
2022-08-31 10:29 ` Dave Collier-Brown
2022-08-31 18:51 ` David Lang
2022-08-31 19:04 ` Dave Taht
2022-08-30 22:50 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-08-30 23:13 ` David Lang
2022-08-31 0:46 ` tom
2022-08-31 0:58 ` Dave Taht
2022-08-31 7:36 ` Mike Puchol
2022-08-31 6:26 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-08-31 7:25 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-08-31 7:31 ` Hayden Simon
2022-08-31 7:33 ` David Lang
2022-08-31 9:59 ` Mike Puchol [this message]
2022-08-31 10:06 ` David Lang
2022-08-31 10:12 ` Mike Puchol
2022-08-31 17:52 ` Dick Roy
2022-08-31 13:41 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-08-31 14:30 ` Mike Puchol
2022-08-31 21:44 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-09-01 7:58 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-09-01 11:38 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-09-01 19:54 ` Michael Richardson
2022-09-01 21:08 ` tom
2022-09-02 7:52 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-09-02 12:29 ` tom
2022-08-31 7:49 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-08-31 9:25 ` Brandon Butterworth
2022-08-31 9:34 ` David Lang
2022-09-01 9:12 ` Brandon Butterworth
2022-08-31 14:52 ` Dave Taht
2022-08-31 15:22 ` [Starlink] starlink upload behavior Dave Taht
2022-09-01 19:24 ` Luis A. Cornejo
2022-09-01 19:50 ` Dave Taht
2022-08-31 8:15 [Starlink] Starlink "beam spread" David Fernández
2022-08-31 14:51 David Fernández
2022-08-31 18:09 ` Michael Richardson
2022-08-31 21:46 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-08-31 23:44 ` Lin Han
2022-09-01 19:26 ` Dave Taht
[not found] <mailman.800.1661972667.1281.starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2022-08-31 19:51 ` David P. Reed
2022-08-31 20:28 ` David Lang
2022-08-31 21:17 ` David P. Reed
2022-08-31 21:33 ` David Lang
2022-09-01 7:05 ` Mike Puchol
2022-09-01 11:43 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-09-01 8:09 ` David Lang
2022-09-01 15:19 David Fernández
2022-09-01 16:33 ` Darrell Budic
2022-09-02 9:32 ` David Fernández
2022-09-01 19:56 ` Michael Richardson
2022-09-02 12:27 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-09-02 18:34 ` Michael Richardson
2022-09-02 20:11 ` Sebastian Moeller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=be8f4d46-f310-4bf4-ade5-2744f301b4ca@Spark \
--to=mike@starlink.sx \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox