Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ulrich Speidel <u.speidel@auckland.ac.nz>
To: Larry Press <lpress@csudh.edu>, David Lang <david@lang.hm>
Cc: "starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net" <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink Digest, Vol 12, Issue 6
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2022 14:50:08 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0458c5e-da70-45fc-edbd-ba03254ecfcb@auckland.ac.nz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR03MB3863776265643B78B2778337C2069@BYAPR03MB3863.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2503 bytes --]


On 6/03/2022 4:25 am, Larry Press wrote:
> > But that's exactly the situation that would make it a party to the conflict and its user a 
> target.
>
> How many terminals do you think they have and who -- which class of 
> person -- do you think has them?
Starlink: With the given ground station arrangement, my best guess would 
be a few hundred. Who has them: The Ukrainian government, FAIK, exclusively.

Non-Starlink: Given that the mobile networks and fixed Internet are 
still operational in most places, including some overrun by the 
Russians, I'd say probably a couple of dozen million? Any mobile phone 
with data connectivity can in principle be shared among multiple users 
as a WiFi hotspot, as can any domestic DSL or fibre connection. I would 
expect there to be significant moves in these networks towards backhaul 
diversification on the provider side as well as towards mesh-ification 
on the user side.


Dishy-sized satellite TV antennas are common household items in Ukraine 
(just have a look at Google Street View), and they have a population 
that is by and large well educated and technically nimble and literate. 
So I'd expect Wi-Fi mesh networks using satellite dishes for range 
extension to become common, too.


But they don't get the PR miles out of this that Starlink do. Only Saint 
Elon does ;-)


BTW: There has been a serious cyber attack on ViaSat's central and 
eastern European KA-SAT services, likely to be connected to the war in 
Ukraine. Collateral damage? The remote monitoring and maintenance 
facilities on around 3,000 German wind turbines. Google translation of 
the article in Der Spiegel is here:


https://www-spiegel-de.translate.goog/netzwelt/web/viasat-satellitennetzwerk-offenbar-gezielt-in-osteuropa-gehackt-a-afd98117-5c32-4946-ab8a-619f1e7af024?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp


The case was flagged by Andreas Knopp from Bundeswehr University in 
Munich, a well-known researcher in the satcom sector (I've met him so I 
know he exists ;-)):


https://idw--online-de.translate.goog/de/news789489?_x_tr_sl=de&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp


-- 

****************************************************************
Dr. Ulrich Speidel

School of Computer Science

Room 303S.594 (City Campus)

The University of Auckland
u.speidel@auckland.ac.nz  
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~ulrich/
****************************************************************



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4838 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2022-03-06  1:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <mailman.1943.1646344903.1267.starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2022-03-03 23:47 ` David P. Reed
2022-03-04  5:06   ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-03-04  7:00     ` Mike Puchol
2022-03-04  8:41       ` David Lang
2022-03-04  9:44         ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-03-04 17:07           ` Larry Press
2022-03-04 23:58             ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-03-04 17:08           ` Dave Täht
2022-03-04 17:10             ` Dave Taht
2022-03-04 18:14           ` David Lang
2022-03-04 18:21             ` Ben Greear
2022-03-04 18:30               ` David Lang
2022-03-05  0:14             ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-03-05  6:38               ` Dick Roy
2022-03-05  9:42                 ` Ulrich Speidel
2022-03-05 10:10                   ` David Lang
2022-03-05 18:26                   ` Dick Roy
2022-03-05 15:25               ` Larry Press
2022-03-06  1:50                 ` Ulrich Speidel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c0458c5e-da70-45fc-edbd-ba03254ecfcb@auckland.ac.nz \
    --to=u.speidel@auckland.ac.nz \
    --cc=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=lpress@csudh.edu \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox