On 10/06/2024 11:50 am, Dave Taht via Starlink wrote:

The second set of questions are that the newer, larger Starlink satellites were designed, oh, 4 years ago? with about 4x the capacity of the existing ones, and I imagine (and hope) that they have been continually redesigned with an eye to latency now, as well as capacity.

What do you actually mean by "capacity" here? We have actual numbers in terms of what SpaceX are licensed for for user downlink, and that works out to be:

From a V1 or V1.5:

From a V2(mini):

Note:

But, like you, I'm somewhat intrigued that we haven't see any follow-up applications from SpaceX at the FCC for the 3rd generation. SAT-LOA-20200526-00055 is four years old, and its latest amendment from March this year (unless something's popped up in the last  few weeks) relates to their D2D plans only. The latest amendment pertinent to Internet things is from August 2021. The gap between Gen 1 (SAT-LOA-20170726-00110) and Gen 2 (SAT-LOA-20200526-00055) was just over three years - and it took almost that long to get SAT-LOA-20170726-00110's last modification SAT-MOD-20200417-00037 filed. Maybe now that they know that they can get a lift, they will. Or maybe they're going flag of convenience and will launch under the Tongan regulator, where they've applied for 29,995 satellites, somewhat more recently.

--
****************************************************************
Dr. Ulrich Speidel

School of Computer Science

Room 303S.594 (City Campus)

The University of Auckland
u.speidel@auckland.ac.nz 
http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~ulrich/
****************************************************************