From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] SpaceX/Starlink says it's ready for a fall satellite-to-cell service with T-Mobile
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 13:43:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d6d50eab-f16f-41c9-a957-04ce75b60704@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJUtOOi8=r+E342DMd5rSbhJ+Ak3c6pA6QVoLROxof4YLxiq8g@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2846 bytes --]
does it say whether it is text only, data only, or everything including
voice?
Le 04/06/2024 à 13:20, Frantisek Borsik via Starlink a écrit :
> Some additional reading from William Webb:
>
> https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/satellite-direct-device-workable-william-webb-sonke/?trackingId=Sjha4DY8SqONFA9g%2Bb5b%2Bw%3D%3D
>
> All the best,
>
> Frank
>
> Frantisek (Frank) Borsik
>
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/frantisekborsik
>
> Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp: +421919416714
>
> iMessage, mobile: +420775230885
>
> Skype: casioa5302ca
>
> frantisek.borsik@gmail.com
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2024 at 2:54 AM David Lang <david@lang.hm> wrote:
>
> Eugene Y Chang wrote:
>
> >> On Jun 3, 2024, at 12:41 PM, David Lang <david@lang.hm> wrote:
> >>
> >> Eugene Y Chang wrote:
> >>
> >>> I expect low data rate because the distance will fall back to
> a lower coding rate.
> >>
> >> I think it's going to be more a matter of very large cells, so
> many people sharing the available bandwidth
> >>
> >>> I observe a difference in my phone’s batter life between urban
> and rural usage. I expect the battery life to be significantly
> reduced with Starlink.
> >>> And yes… if the phone isn’t communicating then the battery
> life isn’t drawn down much…
> >>
> >> In my experience, a phone that's trying to find a tower uses
> more power than one that has a tower, but is otherwise idle
> >
> > When the phone is searching for a tower, it is transmitting at
> maximum power.
> > Then, the phone adjusts the transmit power according to the
> distance to the tower,
> > In an urban environment, the distance to the tower is usually
> less (i.e. smaller cells due to subscriber density).
> > In a rural environment, there is more distance to the tower, and
> the phone is transmitting at higher power (i.e., towers are
> farther apart for larger cells due to fewer subscribers per tower,
> up to the max tower separation.)
> > When you are mobile, the power is proportionate to the mean
> distance to the tower during your operations.
>
> and for direct-to-satellite, it's going to be a max power
> situation, similar to
> rural.
>
> But when a phone is not connected, how frequent are it's searches
> for towers
> (especially if it has multiple bands to check) compared to the
> 'keepalive' pings
> when it is connected? if it's doing more transmissions for it's
> search and
> attempts to connect than it does while connected and just
> confirming the
> connection, that could eat more power.
>
> David Lang
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7708 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-04 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-03 18:08 Frantisek Borsik
2024-06-03 18:17 ` the keyboard of geoff goodfellow
2024-06-04 12:32 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2024-06-03 20:47 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-06-03 21:16 ` David Lang
2024-06-03 21:57 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-06-03 21:59 ` Frantisek Borsik
2024-06-03 22:41 ` David Lang
2024-06-04 0:13 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-06-04 0:54 ` David Lang
2024-06-04 11:20 ` Frantisek Borsik
2024-06-04 11:43 ` Alexandre Petrescu [this message]
2024-06-04 11:54 ` Frantisek Borsik
2024-06-04 13:11 ` Ulrich Speidel
2024-06-04 18:10 ` David Lang
2024-06-04 18:51 ` Eugene Y Chang
2024-06-04 18:58 ` Michael Richardson
2024-06-04 23:01 ` Mike Puchol
2024-06-05 3:17 ` David Lang
2024-06-05 4:16 ` Mike Puchol
2024-06-05 4:26 ` David Lang
2024-06-05 4:47 ` Sebastian Moeller
2024-06-05 6:12 ` Mike Puchol
2024-06-05 7:03 ` David Lang
2024-06-05 11:30 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2024-06-04 10:42 David Fernández
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d6d50eab-f16f-41c9-a957-04ce75b60704@gmail.com \
--to=alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox