Re: [Starlink] SpaceX ordered to explain pricing strategy

[Mike Puchol <mike@starlink.sx>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1573 bytes --]

Oh, one thing we know for sure is they are already covering certain cells with multiple channels (different frequencies, as mentioned). We have observed two terminals in the same location having different POP latency patterns, which can only be explained by having two separate paths.

Best,

Mike
On Apr 13, 2022, 00:30 +0200, Jeremy Austin <jeremy@aterlo.com>, wrote:
>
>
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 1:25 PM Mike Puchol <mike@starlink.sx> wrote:
> > > The frequency re-use is a factor of steering angle. Take these two spot beams, and the cells that they cover. The left side is a beam almost at nadir, the right side is close to maximum steering angle. Any hexagonal cell inside the beam’s footprint cannot be covered by another beam (from same or other satellite), as the overlap would violate the restrictions on Starlink’s license:
> >
> >  I don't disagree with the description of this type of spatial reuse.  It will be interesting to see how nonlinear the capacity growth due to tighter angles is, however, and whether it's more like a 4x increase or an 8x increase.
> >
> > The question of whether they can achieve their goals without additional reuse (for example, covering a given hex with more than one channel) is open. Fun times.
>
>
> --
> --
> Jeremy Austin
> Sr. Product Manager
> Preseem | Aterlo Networks
> preseem.com
>
> Book a Call: https://app.hubspot.com/meetings/jeremy548
> Phone: 1-833-733-7336 x718
> Email: jeremy@preseem.com
>
> Stay Connected with Newsletters & More: https://preseem.com/stay-connected/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3518 bytes --]