From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=; dkim=pass header.d=bogons.net; arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=pass (Used From Domain Record) header.from=bogons.net policy.dmarc=none Received: from mail0.hex.bogons.net (mail0.rbsov.bogons.net [IPv6:2001:4b10:0:1001::12]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0937866369C for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 18:26:01 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bogons.net; s=dkim2019; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Reply-To: References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Sender:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=m4LQ616TK9nqEVNzxCWe5Fo2GxbAkT35Ld/RQsK75Cg=; b=YOPt+DHX9jbTSoec+a7mQhd1w9 RFa5uUByHKUkQjqOKXSm6OaHAdppWIRp0SFdczhjdlmAqJBlt5nWA1DFKOgm7TV6h0QDDWkm8W32A iB5p0zMBsvFwaB0DXqAKnBrzifiDM9FDGFigyVl7i5DG6EtFHZE1TrC9A5EPJhEV0xEbYepPpT1O6 kGmklAa8ekrlc+USISPDcRdFJb17zDONVFYstSu3fwSj2onQO4N92HMx25/uAOCCf1TKXaCIXkqk2 t54VKLMQ9BJtE1roFD3eI/anHu+wnWWrxff8ADq83o8bkrSex6si+18bsHE/TWbQZeZs+zfjP7Pv7 efxzkDnA==; Envelope-to: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Received: from vr0-g0-1-0.thdo.bogons.net ([85.158.40.74] helo=[IPv6:::ffff:132.185.28.54]) by mail0.hex.bogons.net with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uwNdv-003SnR-0N for starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 17:26:00 +0100 From: "Brandon Butterworth" To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 16:25:28 +0000 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <4c67da9b-f1a8-4303-82a6-77b0e404fe10@gmail.com> References: <4c67da9b-f1a8-4303-82a6-77b0e404fe10@gmail.com> User-Agent: eM_Client/10.3.2622.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -3.5 X-Spam-Level: --- X-Spam-Report: No, hits=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=HELO_MISC_IP,RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED,RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL,RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 Message-ID-Hash: E4ST32CWIZQRAQEKKZFMOZ7EVYU5T6WS X-Message-ID-Hash: E4ST32CWIZQRAQEKKZFMOZ7EVYU5T6WS X-MailFrom: brandon-ml@bogons.net X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: Brandon Butterworth Subject: [Starlink] on a more technical side List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 10/09/2025 17:17:53, "Inemesit Affia via Starlink"=20 wrote: >Closer means better performance for both uploads and downloads Gradually lower earth orbits. One day they might plant some towers on the ground for greater spectrum reuse over smaller areas and access to dedicated optical backhaul. brandon