From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailout3.rbg.tum.de (mailout3.rbg.tum.de [131.159.0.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADCEC3B2A4 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 13:13:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (mailrelay1.in.tum.de [131.159.254.14]) by mailout3.rbg.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F3F61001A1 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 19:13:20 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=in.tum.de; s=20220209; t=1708971200; bh=Kz92RfmNdfOlqhs2C1CZQ23Lo9QxnGWyyDBPLgDs9ko=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=OnQmvO3Bor2mfI9Q/tm7F71DIT3l3Ed2S0zLstH5niO0q53wR8a7/ufsR52PWdJsP 4IEL0+yfLFAgpRhWsHvwY/7xtkuxWWXN/Uoa6GpkFPN4yZY75QkaIEkklbpRbcWC8b pip8SFpejiiuZUO3Kao4uJ4lEDzrn3eBl96Gj2h1RLshNih7aTvCAC6NG6Hw1SRbeS l8rtSYSRXK444C9qKgzqKbknThVkOgGSriwNrHbaNcnAJ10UKlvKziBtqk0XRdg8gm XI2YWFjXrXtzR0NMBcflpTEbSjxacsAoICb7qy2wdfy038g3Z98RSNtTRpbg/h61uJ sw8KPp1YX5A5w== Received: by mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (Postfix, from userid 112) id 48E10FC; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 19:13:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17AA299 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 19:13:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.in.tum.de (mailproxy.in.tum.de [IPv6:2a09:80c0::78]) by mailrelay1.rbg.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15C8974 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 19:13:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.in.tum.de (Postfix, from userid 112) id 11D7D4A0210; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 19:13:20 +0100 (CET) Received: (Authenticated sender: mohan) by mail.in.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C54A4A01D8 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 19:13:09 +0100 (CET) (Extended-Queue-bit xtech_yl@fff.in.tum.de) Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:12:53 +0000 From: Nitinder Mohan To: "=?utf-8?Q?starlink=40lists.bufferbloat.net?=" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="65dcd4b4_1ece5498_2c4" Subject: [Starlink] Comprehensive Measurement Study on Starlink Performance Published X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:13:21 -0000 --65dcd4b4_1ece5498_2c4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi folks, Our comprehensive multifaceted measurement study looking at Starlink glob= al and last-mile performance is now available online:=C2=A0https://arxiv.= org/abs/2310.09242.=C2=A0 TL;DR: See the summary in this nice teaser video we made:=C2=A0https://yo= utu.be/WtE3MoK8J80=C2=A0 We looked at several third-party measurement sources (M-Lab, RIPE Atlas) = and performed our own measurements over multiple Starlink dishes to uncov= er the following: 1. How different is Starlink network performance globally=3F How do groun= d station and PoP availability impact performance=3F 2. How much latency is consumed by the satellite part of the link=3F 3. Is Starlink connection affected by bufferbloat=3F 4. Are satellite handovers the root-cause of Starlink 15-sec reconfigurat= ions=3F 5. How good is Starlink compared to terrestrial cellular networks for rea= l-time applications, specifically Cloud Gaming and Zoom. The study has been accepted and will appear in=C2=A0ACM The Web Conferenc= e 2024=C2=A0(WWW), which is a flagship venue that has historically housed= several pioneering works central to Internet success. =46eel free to let me know if you have any questions related to the work.= =C2=A0 P.S. We also thanked this mailing list in our paper for providing us seve= ral key insights and inquisitive=C2=A0discussions :) Thanks and Regards Nitinder Mohan Technical University Munich (TUM) https://www.nitindermohan.com/ --65dcd4b4_1ece5498_2c4 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Hi folks,

Our compreh= ensive multifaceted measurement study looking at Starlink global and last= -mile performance is now available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.09242. 
=

=
TL;DR: See the summary in this nice teaser video we made: https://youtu.be/WtE3MoK8J80 =

We looked at several third-party measurement sources (M-Lab, RIPE = Atlas) and performed our own measurements over multiple Starlink dishes t= o uncover the following:

1. How different is Starlink network perf= ormance globally=3F How do ground station and PoP availability impact per= formance=3F
2. How much latency is consumed by the satellite part of the= link=3F
3. Is Starlink connection affected by bufferbloat=3F
4. Are sa= tellite handovers the root-cause of Starlink 15-sec reconfigurations=3F
= 5. How good is Starlink compared to terrestrial cellular networks for rea= l-time applications, specifically Cloud Gaming and Zoom.

The study h= as been accepted and will appear in ACM The Web Conference 2024 (WWW), which is a fl= agship venue that has historically housed several pioneering works centra= l to Internet success.

=46eel free to let me kno= w if you have any questions related to the work. 

P.S. We also thanked this mailing list in our paper for providing us se= veral key insights and inquisitive discussions :)

Thanks and Regards

Nitin= der Mohan
Technical University Mu= nich (TUM)
<= /div> --65dcd4b4_1ece5498_2c4--