From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qv1-xf32.google.com (mail-qv1-xf32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32A533CB37 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 11:22:30 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-qv1-xf32.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-66d2f3bb312so28284556d6.0 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 08:22:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1699892549; x=1700497349; darn=lists.bufferbloat.net; h=read-receipt-to:disposition-notification-to:mime-version:subject :references:in-reply-to:message-id:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FZI9dVs8LWsbDWC2yQu97H/ObqXpjVToth3CeVasK9I=; b=QpiJW4eorAMB4efsOPOj2RtLOrcJj3Ja1uAlzGQiYeRjwNdg7zIDBUXwggU4ovAbN2 8cNX8NES1zcmy4Tu+3obIgbM+ghOHLhPQQz8YSBm53ZWhE7Wm35Bs6JZ49z3vdQDDf6h qhQwFO+PbU7fDAiWFo76yDLopbO/k/l+gtPejY3+1CIeIqTsFtVr/+r4qBt3edhyhOf2 9Akvia0ggf1DBQuj4962HbhC9ZEJkcsMw/+Hetkev+a1dHQoUn6mZ+egpAlgReMPr19K Mt9CR9zhl0RHsBEGLWlRNN5HzI+/YiMnKceL7ZASB1+9CBkIdMqcLx4yyX/pSUUQknZ3 2s2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699892549; x=1700497349; h=read-receipt-to:disposition-notification-to:mime-version:subject :references:in-reply-to:message-id:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FZI9dVs8LWsbDWC2yQu97H/ObqXpjVToth3CeVasK9I=; b=G7C7JNxoJgF2CKK4+/h7bnAh1XTbrVgrLcYDIGOoQvSeaOusBk7gzv2prNF52+KM3g 92KmasiXH1M5E31yX/qMJP5Ecbzelcal0LhCF0c+8xTWkU+oH+3LkI/k+TLDyvojc8my EvNV/jxeQ+gX/cpRdso7M6tBryc9aPGrkQPFSfCuta8X1Tl2QaPYOD2c//hpBJOdEP/D KitCgJleKqCVKUqBO2hokg7/XN8CX2RMssZIwGTt4iqeDMGc+2OT83JmKDIMlO4TnMVV KqDs+Hafzpb086+nl6UljbhB5+xxpUR62xTdR9qK3mCJ0IqpyEfi+IeqtzHe6xeHumA2 VmIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz4X5rPN/351eWzsrpwv9ZNfeUuRJvncKYWI6MDQRd10nWxMpnv xehJ/55qUVpmAzJ4RoJyYLuBnUOrTneGsc7gryU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH1BofFl26ZWboEYSHlFOcj3PZQP/3Avd6cLGftt5WDFVSMvNOEXEg3F5QJOhwEjYB3C7ZZnQ== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:f611:0:b0:66d:630a:79b9 with SMTP id r17-20020a0cf611000000b0066d630a79b9mr6864710qvm.40.1699892549550; Mon, 13 Nov 2023 08:22:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([212.103.48.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j16-20020a0cc350000000b006564afc5908sm2164216qvi.111.2023.11.13.08.22.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Nov 2023 08:22:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 17:22:23 +0100 (GMT+01:00) From: Inemesit Affia To: J Pan Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <68f92846-73eb-4183-ad97-79f2aa56b022@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4_27912717.1699892543790" X-Correlation-ID: Read-Receipt-To: inemesitaffia@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Starlink] one dish per household is silly. X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2023 16:22:30 -0000 ------=_Part_4_27912717.1699892543790 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You have to size power equipment for max power plus a percentage regardless= of current traffic needs. Look for the ANATEL docs on Reddit you'll see it there(per dish at least). = Or search the NASASpaceflight forum. I think it's 250kw peak. Could be 25kw instead can't remember right. But ea= ch dish is more than 5kw and there's other equipment than dishes Nov 13, 2023 5:10:27 PM J Pan : > is the power consumption related to traffic volume? currently the > traffic is very light > https://www.reddit.com/r/StarlinkEngineering/comments/17k3jas/intergs_gro= und_station_satellite_links_much/ > --=20 > J Pan, UVic CSc, ECS566, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), Pan@UVic.CA, Web.UVic.CA/~= pan >=20 > On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 10:40=E2=80=AFPM Inemesit Affia via Starlink > wrote: >>=20 >> It's kinda expensive to run. Likely 75KW peak. >>=20 >> Check the power requirements for a regular gateway and divide by two. >>=20 >> Might be useful for Taiwanese Islands though >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlink mailing list >> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink ------=_Part_4_27912717.1699892543790 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You have to si= ze power equipment for max power plus a percentage regardless of current tr= affic needs.

Look for t= he ANATEL docs on Reddit you'll see it there(per dish at least). Or search = the NASASpaceflight forum.

I think it= 's 250kw peak. Could be 25kw instead can't remember right. But each dish is= more than 5kw and there's other equipment than dishes

Nov 13, 2023 5:10:27 PM J Pan <Pan@uvic.ca>:

is the power consumption related to traffic volume? currently the=20
traffic is very light=20
https://www.reddit.com/r/StarlinkEngineering/comments/17k3jas/intergs= _ground_station_satellite_links_much/=20
--=20
J Pan, UVic CSc, ECS566, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), Pan@UVic.CA, Web.UVic.= CA/~pan=20

On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 10:40=E2=80=AFPM Inemesit Affia via Starlink= =20
<starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:=20

It's kinda expensive to run. Likely 75KW peak.=20

Check the power requirements for a regular gateway and divide by two= .=20

Might be useful for Taiwanese Islands though=20
_______________________________________________=20
Starlink mailing list=20
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net=20
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink=20
------=_Part_4_27912717.1699892543790--