From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 695DF3CB37 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 11:58:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 3AAGwPAO053488; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 17:58:26 +0100 Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id E0CCB204B7C; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 17:58:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet1-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.12]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D408E204A53; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 17:58:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.8.32.70] (is156570.intra.cea.fr [10.8.32.70]) by muguet1-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 3AAGwPk9048814; Fri, 10 Nov 2023 17:58:25 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 17:58:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: fr To: David Lang Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <13641F2C-B933-49AF-8289-7B8917667AAE@pch.net> <86062ps2-on4p-s855-6ss9-pr475q32q752@ynat.uz> <5df2b2b9-fc8a-4147-8a53-5b7baf268339@gmail.com> From: Alexandre Petrescu In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CEA-Virus: SOPHOS_SAVI_ERROR_OLD_VIRUS_DATA Subject: Re: [Starlink] [NNagain] one dish per household is silly. X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 16:58:29 -0000 Le 10/11/2023 à 17:40, David Lang a écrit : > On Fri, 10 Nov 2023, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: > >>> I'm not understanding what you think Starlink is prohibiting >>> here. >> >> Original poster (Dave, not me) provided this text: "There is no >> prohibition against sharing. The closest that document comes to it >> is: "The Standard Service Plan is designed for personal, family, >> or household use."" >> >> If that text is true, I tend to agree with the interpretation that >> that text prohibits sharing the wifi. >> >> It says 'personal, family, household'. That certainly means to be: >> not my visitors, not my neighbors. > > it says 'designed for' not 'limited to' > > They list this, but then they also ship a handful of dishes to rural > Indian villages to be setup in the community center for everyone to > use. I agree with your interpretation as well. It is a sign of generosity that is valuable. For me, it is a matter of law speech and I am not good at it. But I agree with you as well. Alex