From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: "Gary E. Miller" <gem@rellim.com>
Cc: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] starlink at sea
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 18:36:57 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <np175ssq-49pr-66sn-9pq6-4rn233srorrr@ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220713175957.5fc577a4@spidey.rellim.com>
It's also true that SpaceX tends to set their prices to undercut the competition
by a nice margin, rather than trying for the lowest possible price (however they
define their competition in a particular case)
We know that their list prices for launches are far above their costs, but still
very comfortably below competing launchers for example (they've done enough
special deals to indicate that they are willing to go MUCH lower than list to
win a bid, and there's no reason to think that they lose money on any launch)
unfortuantly for the more casual boater, it seems that they've decided the
competition is the type of service they've been using on their barges. (taking
the market from the top down). We can hope that they will add a cheaper, less
performant tier later.
David Lang
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022, Gary E. Miller via Starlink wrote:
> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:59:57 -0700
> From: Gary E. Miller via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Reply-To: Gary E. Miller <gem@rellim.com>
> To: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Subject: Re: [Starlink] starlink at sea
>
> Yo David!
>
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 17:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
> David Lang <david@lang.hm> wrote:
>
>> it all depends on what you are comparing it to. This isn't designed
>> for a 30 ft boat, but rather for commercial operations. SpaceX had
>> talked about how this replaces the earlier satellite services they
>> have had on their boats that were unreliable and cost >$150k/month
>> with much better service listing for <$50k/month (for all their boats)
>
> Yes, it compares favorably to the existing alternatives. A mega-yauct
> owner would not notice the price.
>
>> This is designed to be an all-weather allways-on service, most
>> boaters could just use a standard starlink RV setup and put it out
>> when they need it (taking it down when the weather is poor)
>
> Excapt, Starlink will not let yuo use the RV roaming plan when offshore.
> The maritime plan explicitly covers open ocean. The RV plan hardly goes
> beyond the sight of land.
>
> I imagine the main driver of the high cost is the prolem in getting
> downlink stations between California and Hawaii, etc. This will be a
> real test of the sat to sat relaying.
>
> RGDS
> GARY
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
> gem@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
>
> Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
> "If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-14 1:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-14 0:20 Dave Taht
2022-07-14 0:31 ` David Lang
2022-07-14 0:36 ` Gary E. Miller
2022-07-14 0:40 ` David Lang
2022-07-14 0:59 ` Gary E. Miller
2022-07-14 1:36 ` David Lang [this message]
2022-07-14 5:46 ` Larry Press
2022-07-14 7:00 ` David Lang
2022-07-14 11:15 ` Mike Puchol
2022-07-14 11:32 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-07-14 12:02 ` Mike Puchol
2022-07-14 12:34 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-07-14 12:49 ` Nitinder Mohan
2022-07-14 12:57 ` Jared Mauch
2022-07-14 13:05 ` Nitinder Mohan
2022-07-14 13:33 ` Nitinder Mohan
2022-07-14 14:56 ` Mike Puchol
2022-07-14 15:28 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-07-14 15:32 ` Nathan Owens
2022-07-27 21:17 ` Dave Taht
2024-07-02 20:40 Dave Taht
2024-07-03 3:40 ` Ulrich Speidel
2024-07-03 17:21 ` Larry Press
2024-07-03 4:21 ` Marc Blanchet
2024-07-03 4:26 ` J Pan
2024-07-03 17:06 ` Larry Press
2024-07-03 22:06 ` Michael Richardson
2024-07-14 19:32 ` J Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=np175ssq-49pr-66sn-9pq6-4rn233srorrr@ynat.uz \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=gem@rellim.com \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox