Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Bennett <jonathanbennett@hackaday.com>,
	 starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink Security Find
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:39:53 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <nr9qo16q-9q73-sn13-7676-s3rro25qp3@ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5YGBMcUOZrS=Fae_L2LN-aeSuaPn5RwefP6RN2fkq8Kg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2107 bytes --]

FYI, I received an email from starlink tuesday that I could finally get my dish 
shipped, so it's on it's way (southern california)

This will be the third Internet link to my house (when I don't use it as a 
remote connection) so it's fair game for experimentation.

David Lang

On Fri, 17 Dec 2021, Dave Taht wrote:

> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:04:32 -0800
> From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
> To: Jonathan Bennett <jonathanbennett@hackaday.com>
> Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink Security Find
> 
> Nice work, Jonathan! You buried the lede... A lot simpler than the
> other two bugs you discussed, either one of which has me inclined to
> log out permanently and head to mexico. Why do we get all these
> security vulns at christmas? I lost a christmas to spectre, another to
> a mips fpu bug, another to the ping of death - I remember how I spent
> those christmases far more clearly than the actual "fun" ones.
>
> Also nice to see the 28ms RTT between you and your friend. Care to try
> a few flent tests between you? or to the internet?
>
> Over here I've been doing some pretty extensive tests of my starlink
> test cloud, from a dsl and a cable modem, the cake rtt_fair results
> (from dallas to sydney) were to die for:
> https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?p=898777#p898627
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:47 AM Jonathan Bennett
> <jonathanbennett@hackaday.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thought you guys might appreciate this. A traceroute lead to a Starlink bug bounty. https://hackaday.com/2021/12/17/this-week-in-security-log4j-pdf-cpu-and-i-hack-starlink/
>>
>> --Jonathan Bennett
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlink mailing list
>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
>
>
> -- 
> I tried to build a better future, a few times:
> https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org
>
> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

      reply	other threads:[~2021-12-17 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-17 15:46 Jonathan Bennett
2021-12-17 16:04 ` Dave Taht
2021-12-17 16:39   ` David Lang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=nr9qo16q-9q73-sn13-7676-s3rro25qp3@ynat.uz \
    --to=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonathanbennett@hackaday.com \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox