From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lang.hm (unknown [66.167.227.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF56F3B2A4 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 11:39:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from dlang-mobile (unknown [10.2.2.69]) by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2833116E84; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:39:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:39:53 -0800 (PST) From: David Lang To: Dave Taht cc: Jonathan Bennett , starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="228850167-273000332-1639759193=:6914" Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink Security Find X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 16:39:55 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --228850167-273000332-1639759193=:6914 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT FYI, I received an email from starlink tuesday that I could finally get my dish shipped, so it's on it's way (southern california) This will be the third Internet link to my house (when I don't use it as a remote connection) so it's fair game for experimentation. David Lang On Fri, 17 Dec 2021, Dave Taht wrote: > Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 08:04:32 -0800 > From: Dave Taht > To: Jonathan Bennett > Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink Security Find > > Nice work, Jonathan! You buried the lede... A lot simpler than the > other two bugs you discussed, either one of which has me inclined to > log out permanently and head to mexico. Why do we get all these > security vulns at christmas? I lost a christmas to spectre, another to > a mips fpu bug, another to the ping of death - I remember how I spent > those christmases far more clearly than the actual "fun" ones. > > Also nice to see the 28ms RTT between you and your friend. Care to try > a few flent tests between you? or to the internet? > > Over here I've been doing some pretty extensive tests of my starlink > test cloud, from a dsl and a cable modem, the cake rtt_fair results > (from dallas to sydney) were to die for: > https://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?p=898777#p898627 > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 7:47 AM Jonathan Bennett > wrote: >> >> Thought you guys might appreciate this. A traceroute lead to a Starlink bug bounty. https://hackaday.com/2021/12/17/this-week-in-security-log4j-pdf-cpu-and-i-hack-starlink/ >> >> --Jonathan Bennett >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlink mailing list >> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > > > > -- > I tried to build a better future, a few times: > https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org > > Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC > _______________________________________________ > Starlink mailing list > Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink --228850167-273000332-1639759193=:6914--