From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lang.hm (unknown [66.167.227.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46DA83B29D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 20:00:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dlang-laptop.local (unknown [10.2.0.162]) by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43504FD43F; Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:00:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:00:12 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@dlang-laptop To: Daniel AJ Sokolov cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: <75cf35be-52ef-fe2b-2a7e-d6224b803789@falco.ca> Message-ID: References: <85542036-9ff8-75d2-438e-c86cc0c105d8@sokolov.eu.org> <75cf35be-52ef-fe2b-2a7e-d6224b803789@falco.ca> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.1 (DEB 209 2017-03-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Starlink] 69,000 Users X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2021 00:00:18 -0000 On Wed, 30 Jun 2021, Daniel AJ Sokolov wrote: > OK. But does it help Starlink if 3 satellites in a train of 10 run an > extra year, and 3 more an extra half year? Can they reasonably "refill" > the train satellite by satellite? so far they have launched between 3 and 60 satellites per launch, not always 60. And if they start using starship to launch (which they plan to as quickly as they can), a single launch can be up to 400 satellites good cost summaries in this video for the new sat systems (not counting strship) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YBzIkt6M4lY David Lang