From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Ulrich Speidel <ulrich@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] speedtest.net takes a look at sat internet around the globe
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 19:10:29 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2108121903160.1653956@qynat-yncgbc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <abe84e08-037b-4433-4ffa-700c5d9aedf4@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
On Fri, 13 Aug 2021, Ulrich Speidel wrote:
> Indeed. But there is more to this than that. Basically, each satellite
> in an inclined orbit crosses each parallel (latitude) up to its
> inclination twice per orbit. Since there is a lot less length of
> parallel at higher-numbered latitudes, parallels with latitudes close
> the the inclination get more satellite crossings per mile of parallel
> per hour. So more rockets isn't going to change the density disparity
> unless their satellites will go into orbits with vastly different
> inclinations (which I hope they will).
the first shell is all the same inclination, but they have launched enough to
get full coverage even down to the equator. later shells are going to be a
different inclination.
see the wikipedia page on starlink for the description of the different shells
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlink#Constellation_design_and_status. phase 1
is ~4200 satellites (they've launched ~1700), phase 2 is an additional ~7500 at
a lower altitude, and they've talked about wanting a phase 3 that would take the
total count of over 40,000 satellites.
David Lang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-13 2:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-12 21:22 Darrell Budic
2021-08-12 22:34 ` Ulrich Speidel
2021-08-12 23:24 ` Ricky Mok
2021-08-13 1:55 ` Ulrich Speidel
2021-08-13 2:10 ` David Lang [this message]
2021-08-13 3:45 ` Ulrich Speidel
2021-08-13 3:57 ` David Lang
2021-08-15 15:47 ` Darrell Budic
2021-08-13 1:54 ` David Lang
2021-08-13 4:51 ` Ulrich Speidel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=nycvar.QRO.7.76.6.2108121903160.1653956@qynat-yncgbc \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=ulrich@cs.auckland.ac.nz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox