From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Ulrich Speidel <u.speidel@auckland.ac.nz>
Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Speaking of retirements...
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2023 18:28:17 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <o3o136n7-1s3n-8sn6-8r12-or18o6nor97s@ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97681ae6-6344-41b4-a7ce-8052155fe8f2@auckland.ac.nz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1707 bytes --]
On Tue, 26 Sep 2023, Ulrich Speidel via Starlink wrote:
> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:45:27 +1300
> From: Ulrich Speidel via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Reply-To: Ulrich Speidel <u.speidel@auckland.ac.nz>
> To: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> Subject: Re: [Starlink] Speaking of retirements...
>
> On 25/09/2023 11:32 pm, Noel Butler via Starlink wrote:
>>
>> On 25/09/2023 18:06, Alexandre Petrescu via Starlink wrote:
>>
>>> ah, sorry, probably we speak of the same thing.
>>>
>>> I dont know whether or not the current in-car starlink devices require an
>>> extra 12v-to-220V/110V adapter, or whether it's included, or integrated.
>> Here, the "RV" is identical to a household service, the same stuff, except
>> your allowed to move around - not locked to the beam covering your home
>> location.
>
> Depending on where on the globe you live, there is a difference in the range
> of Dishy options available (or at least advertised), which is where perhaps
> some of the confusion arises.
>
> The "RV" option available in Australia and NZ at this time is indeed the
> residential option without the cell lock. It's intended for stationary use
> and assumes that you have a mains (AC) power source. We've tried it here with
> the much taunted Yaosheng adapter, which however isn't 12V (it needs 42V) and
> which gave us a lot more outages than the Starlink router with Ethernet
> adapter.
12v DC to 48v DC for PoE should be significantly more efficient that a round
trip through 110/60Hz or 220/50Hz
any chance that you were short on current capacity for 48v?
When you were seeing outages, was the dish dropping the link to you, or the link
to the satellite?
David Lang
[-- Attachment #2: Type: image/png, Size: 1328 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 149 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-26 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-25 6:05 Noel Butler
2023-09-25 7:56 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-09-25 8:06 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-09-25 10:32 ` Noel Butler
2023-09-25 11:45 ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-09-26 1:28 ` David Lang [this message]
2023-09-26 10:46 ` Noel Butler
2023-09-26 11:02 ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-09-30 1:56 ` Noel Butler
2023-09-25 9:01 ` David Lang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=o3o136n7-1s3n-8sn6-8r12-or18o6nor97s@ynat.uz \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=u.speidel@auckland.ac.nz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox