Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: J Pan <Pan@uvic.ca>
Cc: David Lang <david@lang.hm>, Daniel AJ Sokolov <daniel@falco.ca>,
	 starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Alphabet spins off Starlink competitor Taara
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:47:25 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <o3o60qnp-n0oq-0rr1-557r-qqq3506n7295@ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHn=e4hea2uiVTRMXCLGkF894SZnPXJ1O1Fuah7MwDdEvZP24A@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1226 bytes --]

J Pan wrote:

> taara is more like a laser bridge for point-to-point, mostly
> stationary nodes, on the ground?

That's how I interpret what's in the posted article.

David Lang

> --
> J Pan, UVic CSc, ECS566, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), Pan@UVic.CA, Web.UVic.CA/~pan
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 4:10 PM David Lang via Starlink
> <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>>
>> Daniel AJ Sokolov wrote:
>>
>>> On 2025-03-17 at 15:50, David Lang via Starlink wrote:
>>>>
>>>> but the claim that it will be far cheaper than Starlink?? that tower and
>>>> a ground station that tracks the satellites in real time is going to be
>>>> FAR more expensive than a dishy. Since it's going to be in motion at all
>>>> times, it's got mechanical parts to wear out, and physically re-aiming a
>>>> laser between connections (on both ends) is going to be a lot slower
>>>> than electronic aiming of a phased array antenna.
>>>
>>> Could'nt you have a phased laser array?
>>
>> nope, the lasers are far more directional and don't interact with each other
>> enough.
>>
>> David Lang
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlink mailing list
>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-18  0:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-17 19:36 Hesham ElBakoury
2025-03-17 22:50 ` David Lang
2025-03-17 23:02   ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2025-03-17 23:10     ` David Lang
2025-03-17 23:25       ` J Pan
2025-03-18  0:47         ` David Lang [this message]
2025-03-17 23:35   ` Marc Blanchet
2025-03-18  0:49     ` David Lang
2025-03-18  5:22       ` Michael Richardson
2025-03-18  6:43         ` Mike Puchol
2025-03-18  7:56           ` Sebastian Moeller
2025-03-18 16:02           ` Steve Stroh
2025-03-18 17:44             ` Craig Polk
2025-03-18  6:25       ` Sebastian Moeller
2025-03-17 23:45 ` Eric Kuhnke
2025-03-17 23:54   ` Brandon Butterworth
2025-03-18  0:04     ` Eric Kuhnke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=o3o60qnp-n0oq-0rr1-557r-qqq3506n7295@ynat.uz \
    --to=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=Pan@uvic.ca \
    --cc=daniel@falco.ca \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox