From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: J Pan <Pan@uvic.ca>
Cc: David Lang <david@lang.hm>, Daniel AJ Sokolov <daniel@falco.ca>,
starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Alphabet spins off Starlink competitor Taara
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:47:25 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <o3o60qnp-n0oq-0rr1-557r-qqq3506n7295@ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHn=e4hea2uiVTRMXCLGkF894SZnPXJ1O1Fuah7MwDdEvZP24A@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1226 bytes --]
J Pan wrote:
> taara is more like a laser bridge for point-to-point, mostly
> stationary nodes, on the ground?
That's how I interpret what's in the posted article.
David Lang
> --
> J Pan, UVic CSc, ECS566, 250-472-5796 (NO VM), Pan@UVic.CA, Web.UVic.CA/~pan
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 4:10 PM David Lang via Starlink
> <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>>
>> Daniel AJ Sokolov wrote:
>>
>>> On 2025-03-17 at 15:50, David Lang via Starlink wrote:
>>>>
>>>> but the claim that it will be far cheaper than Starlink?? that tower and
>>>> a ground station that tracks the satellites in real time is going to be
>>>> FAR more expensive than a dishy. Since it's going to be in motion at all
>>>> times, it's got mechanical parts to wear out, and physically re-aiming a
>>>> laser between connections (on both ends) is going to be a lot slower
>>>> than electronic aiming of a phased array antenna.
>>>
>>> Could'nt you have a phased laser array?
>>
>> nope, the lasers are far more directional and don't interact with each other
>> enough.
>>
>> David Lang
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlink mailing list
>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-18 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-17 19:36 Hesham ElBakoury
2025-03-17 22:50 ` David Lang
2025-03-17 23:02 ` Daniel AJ Sokolov
2025-03-17 23:10 ` David Lang
2025-03-17 23:25 ` J Pan
2025-03-18 0:47 ` David Lang [this message]
2025-03-17 23:35 ` Marc Blanchet
2025-03-18 0:49 ` David Lang
2025-03-18 5:22 ` Michael Richardson
2025-03-18 6:43 ` Mike Puchol
2025-03-18 7:56 ` Sebastian Moeller
2025-03-18 16:02 ` Steve Stroh
2025-03-18 17:44 ` Craig Polk
2025-03-18 6:25 ` Sebastian Moeller
2025-03-17 23:45 ` Eric Kuhnke
2025-03-17 23:54 ` Brandon Butterworth
2025-03-18 0:04 ` Eric Kuhnke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=o3o60qnp-n0oq-0rr1-557r-qqq3506n7295@ynat.uz \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=Pan@uvic.ca \
--cc=daniel@falco.ca \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox