From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Cc: David Lang <david@lang.hm>, starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] APNIC56 last week
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 10:26:06 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <o55p41n6-10n0-70p9-8880-nr55q4rp72sn@ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32196.1695402777@localhost>
We don't know what their routing in space is. But we know that it isn't just up
to a single satellite and back down to a ground station.
But I will say that since they NAT the connection at the ground station (or
Internet peering point), and not allowing dishy-to-dishy direct communications
yet, they aren't sending different packets to different destinations, they are
sending them all to the single internet gateway
David Lang
On Fri, 22 Sep 2023, Michael Richardson wrote:
> David Lang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> > We know the lasers are in operation as they are providing service to places
> > more than one sat hop away from ground stations. We also know they have a lot
> > of ground stations around to share the load.
>
> But, is it still bent pipe (long, kinked, fine) solution?
> There are no L2 or L3 decisions being made in the satellites themselves yet?
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-22 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-19 4:39 Ulrich Speidel
2023-09-20 1:13 ` Dave Taht
2023-09-23 1:33 ` Noel Butler
2023-09-23 1:47 ` Vint Cerf
2023-09-23 4:22 ` Noel Butler
2023-09-23 6:41 ` Gert Doering
2023-09-23 10:53 ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-09-23 11:28 ` Sebastian Moeller
2023-09-23 12:56 ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-09-25 4:40 ` Noel Butler
2023-09-25 5:00 ` Ulrich Speidel
2023-09-25 5:10 ` Hayden Simon
2023-09-25 5:51 ` Noel Butler
2023-09-23 12:08 ` Hesham ElBakoury
2023-09-24 18:30 ` Michael Richardson
2023-09-25 4:04 ` Noel Butler
2023-09-21 13:20 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-09-21 19:05 ` Inemesit Affia
2023-09-21 19:08 ` Dave Taht
2023-09-22 8:26 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-09-22 8:41 ` David Lang
2023-09-22 17:12 ` Michael Richardson
2023-09-22 17:26 ` David Lang [this message]
2023-09-22 18:52 ` Michael Richardson
2023-09-23 21:55 ` Larry Press
2023-09-24 2:46 ` Dave Taht
2023-09-24 12:00 ` Hesham ElBakoury
2023-09-25 7:46 ` Alexandre Petrescu
2023-09-25 8:59 ` David Lang
2023-09-25 12:30 ` Frantisek Borsik
2023-09-22 17:00 David Fernández
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=o55p41n6-10n0-70p9-8880-nr55q4rp72sn@ynat.uz \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=mcr@sandelman.ca \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox