Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: Eugene Y Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org>,
	David Lang <david@lang.hm>,
	 Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Best Effort" offering
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 02:14:24 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pso8oro2-qoqr-2os0-r262-2o347q71104@ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9BBC901E-B98E-4C0D-BEEF-2F6D56AB27A3@gmx.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4924 bytes --]

On Thu, 29 Sep 2022, Sebastian Moeller wrote:

>> On Sep 29, 2022, at 09:50, Eugene Y Chang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>>
>> Good point… that sure makes matching new capacity to new subscribers really hard.
>
> 	[SM] Or easy: "just" add more satellites ;) some of the added capacity should also end up at new subscribers... SCNR

yep, which is what they are doing. ;-)

there is some that they can do in terms of the ground station positioning, 
density, and connectivity.

David Lang

> Regards
> 	Sebastian
>
>
>>
>> Gene
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> Eugene Chang
>> IEEE Senior Life Member
>> eugene.chang@ieee.org
>> 781-799-0233 (in Honolulu)
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 28, 2022, at 6:29 PM, David Lang <david@lang.hm> wrote:
>>>
>>> that strip of land is different every orbit, a given satellite doesn't pass over the same land each orbit.
>>>
>>> David Lang
>>>
>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Eugene Y Chang wrote:
>>>
>>>> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:40:35 -1000
>>>> From: Eugene Y Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org>
>>>> To: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
>>>> Cc: Eugene Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org>, Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>,
>>>>    Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Best Effort" offering
>>>> Yes and no.
>>>>
>>>> Yes they can beef up the constellation, one section at a time. (For a given launch, the are enhancing a particular orbit.)
>>>>
>>>> Depending on your definition of “one area” when you say “not in any one area”.
>>>> Technically they would beef up an area in the shape of strips, where the strip is the ground under the orbit of the additional (new) satellites.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, when I say “add service to an area”, it implies adding coverage to strips of land, the land under the new satellite orbit.
>>>>
>>>> https://satellitemap.space/?constellation=starlink <https://satellitemap.space/?constellation=starlink>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gene
>>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>> Eugene Chang
>>>> IEEE Senior Life Member
>>>> eugene.chang@ieee.org
>>>> 781-799-0233 (in Honolulu)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 28, 2022, at 1:35 PM, David Lang <david@lang.hm> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The Starlink satellites are in low orbit (<90 min), so you beef up the contellation overall, not in any one area.
>>>>>
>>>>> David Lang
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Eugene Y Chang via Starlink wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:07:43 -1000
>>>>>> From: Eugene Y Chang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>>>>>> Reply-To: Eugene Y Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org>
>>>>>> To: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Best Effort" offering
>>>>>> What is the definition and differences between regular and best effort service?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Creating two bookings queue, wait list and best effort subscribers, the best effort subscribers are more “real”. With that, treating best effort subscribers as a (more) "real customer" backlog, it would be a good way to prioritize where to expand the constellation (i.e. where to add capacity).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gene
>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Eugene Chang
>>>>>> IEEE Senior Life Member
>>>>>> eugene.chang@ieee.org
>>>>>> 781-799-0233 (in Honolulu)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sep 28, 2022, at 9:53 AM, Dotzero via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've been on the wait list for almost 10 months and just received an email that I can sign up for a "best efforts" offering. Seeing as they also indicated the estimated time for regular service is mid-2023, I decided to go with it (You don't lose your place on the wait list). You can also "pause" the best effort service so I don't really have anything to lose.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Has anyone had experience with this offering? Any input appreciated. If it makes a difference, location is Central East Ohio.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> According to https://www.starlink.com/legal/documents/DOC-1002-69942-69?regionCode=US <https://www.starlink.com/legal/documents/DOC-1002-69942-69?regionCode=US>, latency will be comparable to regular service, down will be 5-100mbs and up will be 1-10mps unless service is deprioritized due to congestion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Starlink mailing list
>>>>>>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>>>>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Starlink mailing list
>>>>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlink mailing list
>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-29  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-28 19:53 Dotzero
2022-09-28 20:01 ` Dave Taht
2022-09-28 20:58   ` Dotzero
2022-09-28 21:02     ` David Lang
2022-09-28 21:04     ` Dave Taht
2022-09-28 23:07 ` Eugene Y Chang
2022-09-28 23:35   ` David Lang
2022-09-29  0:40     ` Eugene Y Chang
2022-09-29  4:29       ` David Lang
2022-09-29  7:50         ` Eugene Y Chang
2022-09-29  9:10           ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-09-29  9:14             ` David Lang [this message]
2022-09-29 19:38               ` Eugene Y Chang
2022-09-30 12:38                 ` Michael Richardson
2022-09-30 12:43                   ` Nathan Owens
2022-09-30 17:24                   ` Eugene Chang
2022-09-30 17:26                     ` Nathan Owens
2022-09-30 18:03                       ` Mike Puchol
2022-09-30 21:39 rob currie
2022-09-30 23:56 ` Eugene Chang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=pso8oro2-qoqr-2os0-r262-2o347q71104@ynat.uz \
    --to=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=eugene.chang@ieee.org \
    --cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox