Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Ricky Mok <cskpmok@caida.org>
Cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Packet losses in a router
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 14:21:34 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <r11sn77p-79q7-or22-1386-qs4prp17pnsn@ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3810e66c-5107-a15c-20aa-44a893393a21@caida.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1312 bytes --]

The first thing I would check is the buffer stats on the machines you are using 
to do the communication. When I'm doing UDP syslog traffic, I have far more 
issues with the endpoints dropping packets than with the network.

David Lang

On Mon, 24 Oct 2022, Ricky Mok via Starlink wrote:

> Couple plausible reasons that I encountered.
>
> e.g., the NIC on the host simply went bad.
>
> The cable (copper) got loose. Dirt may get into the fiber optics port.
>
> Ricky
>
> On 10/24/2022 1:13 PM, David Fernández via Starlink wrote:
>> Dear participants of this list,
>>
>> If you had a router that in lab conditions, with Gigabit Ethernet
>> interfaces, that losses 1 or 2 out of a few thousands of UDP packets
>> of a few hundreds of bytes each one, during a test of 1 minute, at
>> only 50 packets/s using iperf2, I am sure that you would investigate
>> why, wouldn't you?
>>
>> Or it is not worth it? Just live with it?
>>
>> Thank you in advance for any answer!
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> David
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlink mailing list
>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-24 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-24 20:13 David Fernández
2022-10-24 20:22 ` Jeff Tantsura
2022-10-25  9:30   ` David Fernández
2022-10-24 20:54 ` Gert Doering
2022-10-24 21:15 ` Ricky Mok
2022-10-24 21:21   ` David Lang [this message]
2022-11-04 12:54 David Fernández
2022-11-05 12:05 ` Gert Doering
2022-11-07  8:34   ` David Fernández

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=r11sn77p-79q7-or22-1386-qs4prp17pnsn@ynat.uz \
    --to=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=cskpmok@caida.org \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox