Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>, David Lang <david@lang.hm>,
	 starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Starlink] starlink and VPN
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:10:55 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <r37p9415-11qq-o52q-npqs-9s13qn2s503r@ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4nGZWPT2y6hMA6jYgRD5J6fkmg0oAgd2JsDmQ+-+Sffw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1602 bytes --]

Dave Taht wrote:

> How about openvpn over ipv6?

I don't have IPv6 at my house that it's connecting to.

> Or with a static ip assigned to the starlink?

that costs more (and much more than the 50g/m starlink mini plan)

David Lang

> Wireguard works for me....
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 3:02 PM Dino Farinacci via Starlink
> <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>>
>> I haven't tried openvpn but I have done a bunch of testing of LISP over Starlink. If anyone wants details I can point you to an Internet Draft and slides that have been presented a couple of times at IETF.
>>
>> Dino
>>
>>> On Jan 20, 2025, at 11:25 PM, David Lang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> has anyone done any work with openvpn over starlink (especially if they got the connectors to completely bypass the router)?
>>>
>>> I've got the basic connectivity working, but am having problems trying to get openvpn to work (especially for traffic back through the cgnat to the router on the starlink side)
>>>
>>> the logs on the client are reporting link local: (not bound) when trying UDP, when I try TCP (and clamp the mtu low) I can connect from the starlink side (st least sometimes) but cannot get the routing the other way to work
>>>
>>> David Lang
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Starlink mailing list
>>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlink mailing list
>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
>
>
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-01-23  3:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-21  7:25 David Lang
2025-01-21 11:43 ` David Collier-Brown
2025-01-21 15:12 ` b. angel
2025-01-21 15:22   ` David Lang
2025-01-21 15:27     ` Sebastian Moeller
2025-01-21 15:36       ` Nils Andreas Svee
2025-01-21 15:45       ` David Lang
2025-01-21 16:14     ` Keith Simonsen
2025-01-21 16:45       ` David Lang
2025-01-21 15:36 ` Gert Doering
2025-01-21 15:52   ` David Lang
2025-01-21 23:02 ` Dino Farinacci
2025-01-22 22:53   ` Dave Taht
2025-01-22 23:25     ` Dino Farinacci
2025-01-22 23:29       ` Darrell Budic
2025-01-22 23:42         ` Dino Farinacci
2025-01-23  3:10     ` David Lang [this message]
2025-01-23 17:31       ` J Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=r37p9415-11qq-o52q-npqs-9s13qn2s503r@ynat.uz \
    --to=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=farinacci@gmail.com \
    --cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox