From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lang.hm (syn-045-059-245-186.biz.spectrum.com [45.59.245.186]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E4BC3B29E for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 22:10:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.2.2.53] (unknown [10.2.2.53]) by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118E21F12FC; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:10:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 19:10:55 -0800 (PST) From: David Lang To: Dave Taht cc: Dino Farinacci , David Lang , starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <269839o2-003o-1756-8r28-3on7q7nsrn54@ynat.uz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="228850167-1036184095-1737601855=:41764" Subject: Re: [Starlink] starlink and VPN X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 03:10:56 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --228850167-1036184095-1737601855=:41764 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Dave Taht wrote: > How about openvpn over ipv6? I don't have IPv6 at my house that it's connecting to. > Or with a static ip assigned to the starlink? that costs more (and much more than the 50g/m starlink mini plan) David Lang > Wireguard works for me.... > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 3:02 PM Dino Farinacci via Starlink > wrote: >> >> I haven't tried openvpn but I have done a bunch of testing of LISP over Starlink. If anyone wants details I can point you to an Internet Draft and slides that have been presented a couple of times at IETF. >> >> Dino >> >>> On Jan 20, 2025, at 11:25 PM, David Lang via Starlink wrote: >>> >>> has anyone done any work with openvpn over starlink (especially if they got the connectors to completely bypass the router)? >>> >>> I've got the basic connectivity working, but am having problems trying to get openvpn to work (especially for traffic back through the cgnat to the router on the starlink side) >>> >>> the logs on the client are reporting link local: (not bound) when trying UDP, when I try TCP (and clamp the mtu low) I can connect from the starlink side (st least sometimes) but cannot get the routing the other way to work >>> >>> David Lang >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Starlink mailing list >>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net >>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlink mailing list >> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink > > > > --228850167-1036184095-1737601855=:41764--