From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lang.hm (unknown [66.167.227.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1E143B2A4 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 09:11:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dlang-mobile (unknown [10.2.2.70]) by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C5014FA5D; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 06:11:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 06:11:20 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang To: Juliusz Chroboczek cc: David Lang , starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: <87v8omo8r3.wl-jch@irif.fr> Message-ID: References: <8735bqpq1r.wl-jch@irif.fr> <65rp9416-298q-33n8-6p20-6195sqp691oq@ynat.uz> <87v8omo8r3.wl-jch@irif.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink no longer available to the Ukrainian army? X-BeenThere: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 13:11:22 -0000 satellites are visible from a wide area, and if you are talking about jamming the Ukrainian Army, they are going to be close enough to affect ground stations as well. On Fri, 14 Oct 2022, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >> you need to provide the rest of the information, namely that Russia is >> actively jamming communications. > > Interesting, I wasn't aware that they have the capability to do that in > areas that they do not control. Do you have any further information? > > -- Juliusz >