From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lang.hm; dkim=fail; arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=none
Received: from mail.lang.hm (wsip-70-167-213-146.ph.ph.cox.net [70.167.213.146])
	by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78F6EBA041F
	for <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 13 Jan 2026 02:03:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.2.2.53] (unknown [10.2.2.53])
	by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB243216EC0;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2026 17:03:00 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 18:02:55 -0700 (MST)
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Ulrich Speidel <u.speidel@auckland.ac.nz>
cc: starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
In-Reply-To: <23685b96-0e02-43d4-96b9-586f340bc937@auckland.ac.nz>
Message-ID: <rq1p197p-850n-119r-pnsp-4s2nn6rrn6s2@ynat.uz>
References: <CAJUtOOgvyrt=RC4_PF2NS6+EL2AL8heTbDN+iyXtwwBd+rJAcw@mail.gmail.com> <23685b96-0e02-43d4-96b9-586f340bc937@auckland.ac.nz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-ID-Hash: PPTX3XMQTMG4EKANNCUPO52ZU3HWJDQW
X-Message-ID-Hash: PPTX3XMQTMG4EKANNCUPO52ZU3HWJDQW
X-MailFrom: david@lang.hm
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10
Precedence: list
Subject: [Starlink] Re: Podcast on in-flight Wi-Fi (Candela Technologies)
List-Id: "Starlink has bufferbloat. Bad." <starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net>
Archived-At: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/starlink/rq1p197p-850n-119r-pnsp-4s2nn6rrn6s2@ynat.uz/>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/starlink/>
List-Help: <mailto:starlink-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:starlink-owner@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Post: <mailto:starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:starlink-join@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:starlink-leave@lists.bufferbloat.net>

Ulrich Speidel wrote:

> Starlink is attractive for backhaul due to the fact that it covers the whole 
> globe,

from the reports, starlink also provides lower latency and more bandwidth to the 
aircraft, making it a much better experience (some of that may be due to the 
fact that starlink is debloated while the traditional uplinks have frequently 
ended up with multi-second latency under load)

David Lang