From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Eugene Y Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org>
Cc: David Lang <david@lang.hm>, Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>,
Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Best Effort" offering
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 21:29:26 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <rrq0139n-5719-3n30-onoo-4r7818o4s524@ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <34E90BC8-4843-4C03-8A74-B50AB2F22995@ieee.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3734 bytes --]
that strip of land is different every orbit, a given satellite doesn't pass over
the same land each orbit.
David Lang
On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Eugene Y Chang wrote:
> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:40:35 -1000
> From: Eugene Y Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org>
> To: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
> Cc: Eugene Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org>, Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>,
> Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Best Effort" offering
>
> Yes and no.
>
> Yes they can beef up the constellation, one section at a time. (For a given launch, the are enhancing a particular orbit.)
>
> Depending on your definition of “one area” when you say “not in any one area”.
> Technically they would beef up an area in the shape of strips, where the strip is the ground under the orbit of the additional (new) satellites.
>
> Sorry, when I say “add service to an area”, it implies adding coverage to strips of land, the land under the new satellite orbit.
>
> https://satellitemap.space/?constellation=starlink <https://satellitemap.space/?constellation=starlink>
>
>
> Gene
> ----------------------------------------------
> Eugene Chang
> IEEE Senior Life Member
> eugene.chang@ieee.org
> 781-799-0233 (in Honolulu)
>
>
>
>> On Sep 28, 2022, at 1:35 PM, David Lang <david@lang.hm> wrote:
>>
>> The Starlink satellites are in low orbit (<90 min), so you beef up the contellation overall, not in any one area.
>>
>> David Lang
>>
>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Eugene Y Chang via Starlink wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 13:07:43 -1000
>>> From: Eugene Y Chang via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>>> Reply-To: Eugene Y Chang <eugene.chang@ieee.org>
>>> To: Dotzero <dotzero@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Dave Taht via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net>
>>> Subject: Re: [Starlink] Starlink "Best Effort" offering
>>> What is the definition and differences between regular and best effort service?
>>>
>>> Creating two bookings queue, wait list and best effort subscribers, the best effort subscribers are more “real”. With that, treating best effort subscribers as a (more) "real customer" backlog, it would be a good way to prioritize where to expand the constellation (i.e. where to add capacity).
>>>
>>> Gene
>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>> Eugene Chang
>>> IEEE Senior Life Member
>>> eugene.chang@ieee.org
>>> 781-799-0233 (in Honolulu)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Sep 28, 2022, at 9:53 AM, Dotzero via Starlink <starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've been on the wait list for almost 10 months and just received an email that I can sign up for a "best efforts" offering. Seeing as they also indicated the estimated time for regular service is mid-2023, I decided to go with it (You don't lose your place on the wait list). You can also "pause" the best effort service so I don't really have anything to lose.
>>>>
>>>> Has anyone had experience with this offering? Any input appreciated. If it makes a difference, location is Central East Ohio.
>>>>
>>>> According to https://www.starlink.com/legal/documents/DOC-1002-69942-69?regionCode=US <https://www.starlink.com/legal/documents/DOC-1002-69942-69?regionCode=US>, latency will be comparable to regular service, down will be 5-100mbs and up will be 1-10mps unless service is deprioritized due to congestion.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Starlink mailing list
>>>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>>>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlink mailing list
>> Starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-29 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-28 19:53 Dotzero
2022-09-28 20:01 ` Dave Taht
2022-09-28 20:58 ` Dotzero
2022-09-28 21:02 ` David Lang
2022-09-28 21:04 ` Dave Taht
2022-09-28 23:07 ` Eugene Y Chang
2022-09-28 23:35 ` David Lang
2022-09-29 0:40 ` Eugene Y Chang
2022-09-29 4:29 ` David Lang [this message]
2022-09-29 7:50 ` Eugene Y Chang
2022-09-29 9:10 ` Sebastian Moeller
2022-09-29 9:14 ` David Lang
2022-09-29 19:38 ` Eugene Y Chang
2022-09-30 12:38 ` Michael Richardson
2022-09-30 12:43 ` Nathan Owens
2022-09-30 17:24 ` Eugene Chang
2022-09-30 17:26 ` Nathan Owens
2022-09-30 18:03 ` Mike Puchol
2022-09-30 21:39 rob currie
2022-09-30 23:56 ` Eugene Chang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/starlink.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=rrq0139n-5719-3n30-onoo-4r7818o4s524@ynat.uz \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=dotzero@gmail.com \
--cc=eugene.chang@ieee.org \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox